Its mostly to disallow goals and its a major own goal too.I thought the idea of VAR was to rectify clear and obvious mistakes.Not forensically analyze huge segments of the game to allow/disallow Goals.
Sorry Marv but i couldn't disagree more. You say say you didn't see any cheating or corruption but in your first line highlight cheating and corruption. Fouls like the palace one happen every single game and i can't remember one ever being used before to disallow a goal via VAR. Just because it was the correct decision (and i don't think it was) doesn't mean its not being used to manipulate and manufacture an outcome. If they suddenly start disallowing goals every time there is that kind of incident, then ill accept it, but we all know it wont.
There was a similar incident on Saturday but the goal in that game was given. I can't remember which game it was now, but it was mentioned on MOTD.
I, naively, thought VAR would make the game fairer, I thought that allowing the refs to have another look at incidents would take away any excuses for bad decisions. However, they've managed to twist it in order to give decisions how they please. It's somehow given them even more ability to manipulate decisions. The ref hides behind the decision from Stockley Park, and the video ref there uses this 'not clear and obvious' excuse to choose to give it or not give, whichever he prefers.
just get the crowd singing pigmol is bent loud enough that its heard on the telly on a live game
Can’t we stay outside for say the last 3 or 4 minutes instead so I can leave early without getting stern glances from proper fans as I slip awayI say fans stay outside for the first 15 mins in protest..... An empty seats protest..... That would get noticed on the telly....
I wouldn’t say clattered. He leant on him.Didn't see it but someone said Van Dyke clattered a defender during the build-up to the Liverrpool winner, but VAR didn't "notice".