applecentral
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 1,807
He can’t strike a match!As a striker though?
He can’t strike a match!As a striker though?
Neymar could rock up. It wouldn’t surprise me.I don't know who is out there that you can sign as a direct Sterling replacement.
But he wants to go and if he wants to go now he would presumably want to go at the end of his deal. Better to grab a fee and get his wages off the books because he was very far from being a nailed-on starter for the coming year.
I halfway wonder if you might see more of Bernardo on the right wing such as was done in the second half of the 18/19 season. Phillips, Foden, Grealish, or even McAtee picking up more of the minutes in midfield.
Pep's City have shown us that you don't necessarily "replace" a departed player - more so find other ways to use the ones you have.
Don’t need the baggage, thank youNeymar could rock up. It wouldn’t surprise me.
Go on. I dare you!If we bring in a natural LB, we’re probably going to use inverted wingers again so…
Left wing - Grealish and…? Maybe Cancelo?
Right wing - Mahrez, Foden, Palmer.
Probably a LW that we’re missing.
Dare I say the N word?
Neymar?
Would Bayern sell him though. Is he for sale?
Would Bayern sell him though. Is he for sale?
I agree. ButDon’t need the baggage, thank you
Isn't he asking for wage parity with Sane which is rumoured to be pretty high ?Yea available for 40 mil. 1 year left on his current contract
I think Sterling and Haaland would work well but I get he has had seven years with us and won a bucket load. If he goes nothing but love from me like for Gabby.Pretty much my view too, especially if he isn’t signing a new contract.
Totally agree. They’ve given their all and want to go somewhere else. No bitterness or animosity, just wish them all the best, except in the weeks leading up to games against us where they slip on a banana skin and are out for 10 days.I think Sterling and Haaland would work well but I get he has had seven years with us and won a bucket load. If he goes nothing but love from me like for Gabby.
Its up to him though isn’t it. We could refuse but lose £50/ 60 million to delay it a year.Personally i think we'd be mad to sell him to Chelsea
Exactly, we either keep him and let him choose who he wants to go to in a year’s time or we take what we can and part ways.Its up to him though isn’t it. We could refuse but lose £50/ 60 million to delay it a year.
Full article here:
![]()
Latest news & breaking headlines
The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.www.thetimes.co.uk
He's spoke to Tuchel who will make him a key player in their team.
We will but not his dithering on the ball, unable to make a decision. But he has been great for us overall. Money talks though, 50 million would be a great deal for the club.We will miss his movement.
I think even outside of the monetary aspect, we really don't want to be seen as a club that refuses to sell or holds players hostage when they want to leave.Its up to him though isn’t it. We could refuse but lose £50/ 60 million to delay it a year.