Random stuff you'd ban if you could

[lefty goldblatt]

People who believe in magic. Usually the same people who say they've seen a ghost.

Add to this, UFOologists.
They're always sad fuckers who can't get wives/girlfriends. Usually no mates at school, too. Guaranteed

 

[bluemoon32]

Cunts who dress as if they're a peaky blinder

 

[Nellies left peg]

Cunts who dress as if they're a peaky blinder

Mockney cockneys

 

[Deleted member 77198]

The word “religion”.

People can think they believe in any of the shit they already do but they should all be called “mythologies” and then everyone would understand that believing in God is about as sensible as believing in Jedis.

Or go one step further and ban children from being taught “religion”. Because all “religion” does is brainwash children into believing in its bollocks from such an early age that they know no different.

See how many people believe in “religion” if they’re only told about it once they reach 18. Everyone would think you needed sectioning if you told them all at 18 the lies they’re told at 3.

Sod it, just ban “religion” full stop.

 

[MillisleBlue]

Anyone regardless of age, gender, colour or creed who begins answering a question with “So”

Oh and folk who use buzz-words but don’t have the wit to know the appropriate context for using them.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Raising inflection.

 

[flyer]

Boob jobs. Never seen a nice pair yet. They're supposed to sway a little ffs

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Cunts who call themselves social media influencers.
Freeloaders I say.
Get a proper job you twats.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

People who have the procedure to make their lips like Trout lips. They look ok on fish but not people you gormless looking cunts


Look at these fuckwits

The only place I want to see engorged labia is between your legs you vacuous bints.

 

[BrianW]

Democracy - we are not sufficiently advanced for it to work. No one should be allowed to vote unless they have passed papers on a) political theory b) macro-economics c) critical thinking and d) modern history. This would reduce the voting population down to about 2-5%, but we would have much better government.