Real Madrid 2nd leg - how?!

And of course had the shoe been on the other foot would we not have done the same thing to ensure the safety of our Club ? Of course we would and you`re being very naive if you think otherwise.
Shoe? Other foot?

The safety of our club, every club is paramount.

Right now, at this moment in time the British Government is not prepared to sanction an air bridge with Portugal, but they are with Spain.

How does that ensure the safety of our club more than Real Madrid (or any club) coming to Manchester?

Look at the BIGGER picture.

EDIT: Personally I think it is more likely we will play at the Etihad (sorry to piss on your negativity theory). My gripe was about the negativity with which sky are reporting it!
 
Shoe? Other foot?

The safety of our club, every club is paramount.

Right now, at this moment in time the British Government is not prepared to sanction an air bridge with Portugal, but they are with Spain.

How does that ensure the safety of our club more than Real Madrid (or any club) coming to Manchester?

Look at the BIGGER picture.
Well you`re the one who started bitching at the fucking wording of Sky !! Hahahha.Fucking hell you`ve completely missed the whole point from start to finish.
UEFA are stating that if for reasons outside of Citys remit and the game cannot be played in Manchester then Portugal will be the new venue.Nothing more,nothing less at this moment in time.
Fuck all wrong with that.
 
Well you`re the one who started bitching at the fucking wording of Sky !! Hahahha.Fucking hell you`ve completely missed the whole point from start to finish.
UEFA are stating that if for reasons outside of Citys remit and the game cannot be played in Manchester then Portugal will be the new venue.Nothing more,nothing less at this moment in time.
Fuck all wrong with that.
Like I said, Sky report to the negative. They would not have done for the Dippers or The Scum. That is all.

Shall we leave it at that?
 
A bit of breaking news on SSN on this.
UEFA confirm Manchester City will have to play Real Madrid In Portugal If Etihad can not host game.

Under what circumstances can we not host the game?

Uefa have categorically stated that we can host the game at the Etihad. They state the only reason we would not be allowed to play the game at the Etihad is if we were leading 2-1.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if it matters where we play , if it had been as scheduled in front of a full ,passionate Etihad crowd we would have strolled it , but a behind closed doors game in a sterile atmosphere it does take away most of the advantage we had.
 
Not sure if it matters where we play , if it had been as scheduled in front of a full ,passionate Etihad crowd we would have strolled it , but a behind closed doors game in a sterile atmosphere it does take away most of the advantage we had.

There's mind games going on though. If we have to play elsewhere psychologically when we think we should be at home then Madrid have won an important battle.
It's quite different though if the UK is in lockdown and it has to go elsewhere or get canned.
 
Not sure if it matters where we play , if it had been as scheduled in front of a full ,passionate Etihad crowd we would have strolled it , but a behind closed doors game in a sterile atmosphere it does take away most of the advantage we had.

There are another 3 last 16 games to be played beside ours. Ours can't be different.
 
There are another 3 last 16 games to be played beside ours. Ours can't be different.

Dont understand your retort , i stated it doesnt matter where we play because we are a better team than Madrid , play anywhere in Timbuktu , Outer Momgolia and UEFA can screw us as much as they want , we will still beat Real
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.