You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch City Games - 2023/24
- Thread starter blue b4 the moon
- Start date
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,962
Agreed on the inconsistencies. It’s what makes all fans mad, but until refs are AI, decisions for the same tackle will be seen differently. The referee doesn’t have the knowledge or time to refer to a tackle made a year ago. It’s purely given by what and how they see it.View attachment 107529
It seems strange that Partay initiated contact last year by not playing the ball as Kevin was about to strike for goal. Result- no penalty. It's the inconsistencies of the decision making thats most annoying.
Fred on kev in cup final.View attachment 107529
It seems strange that Partay initiated contact last year by not playing the ball as Kevin was about to strike for goal. Result- no penalty. It's the inconsistencies of the decision making thats most annoying.
Exactly the same
Bluechipblue
Well-Known Member
Agreed. It doesn't make it any less infuriating though.Agreed on the inconsistencies. It’s what makes all fans mad, but until refs are AI, decisions for the same tackle will be seen differently. The referee doesn’t have the knowledge or time to refer to a tackle made a year ago. It’s purely given by what and how they see it.
Pity Bernard Silva wasn't allowed that totting up process.
First foul on as a sub..... yellow
TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 4,019
I wish posters would stop talking about inconsistencies. The decisions are very, very consistent. Play in red and it goes in your favour - every time, very consistent.
City - goes against you 9 out of 10. Again, very consistent.
City v Liverpool - 100 out of 100 to dippers
City - goes against you 9 out of 10. Again, very consistent.
City v Liverpool - 100 out of 100 to dippers
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
View attachment 107529
It seems strange that Partay initiated contact last year by not playing the ball as Kevin was about to strike for goal. Result- no penalty. It's the inconsistencies of the decision making thats most annoying.
There’s no inconsistency. City player initiates the foul = no penalty. Opposition player initiates the foul = no penalty.
perfectly consistent.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Darren England tomorrow hes the one involved in the offside goal as the VAR official that cost the scousers so he owes them one