The second one.... he was told to give it that's why. I would have accepted it if it was only the first pen he missed but to miss 2 ?I don’t really think the first one was clear, Jesus was already falling over and Zouma didn’t affect that in any way. Second one he did give.
He does but the referee doesn't have to look at the replay. The VAR can tell the referee it's an obvious penalty and the referee can just give it.No he didn't, he has to refer it to the on field ref to make the final decision.
So, by your own definition, an on field review is appropriate. What is/isn't a foul comes under "subjective decision".He does but the referee doesn't have to look at the replay. The VAR can tell the referee it's an obvious penalty and the referee can just give it.
- For subjective decisions, e.g. intensity of a foul challenge, interference at offside, handball considerations, an ‘on-field review’ (OFR) is appropriate
- For factual decisions e.g. position of an offence or player (offside), point of contact (handball/foul), location (inside or outside the penalty area), ball out of play etc. a VAR-only review is usually appropriate but an ‘on-field review’ (OFR) can be used for a factual decision if it will help manage the players/match or ‘sell’ the decision (e.g. a crucial match-deciding decision late in the game)
Don't have an account?Register now!