I refer you back to my previous point.
You're can't be well to believe all this.
It’s okay that you may experience mental illness and want to kill yourself whilst carrying this child and resent raising them because they are a permanent reminder of your trauma but please think..... What Would Jesus Do?
Focusing on the key issues the usual “hard cases” pushed by pro-abortionists go flat. What about the humanity of the unborn? Do they not have a say in their own death? Who is defending their right to live every single day? It is established from a medical point of view that the unborn really is human and also how bad the usual pro-abortion arguments are as we legitimately substitute “unborn baby” with a two-year-old (“2yo”) in the following arguments, therefore undercutting the gut-wrenching heart tugs that pro-abortionists use (the informal logical fallacy is argumentum ad misericordiam, Appeal to Pity):
A 2yo is so disruptive and causing such heartache for his solo mother that she wants him killed, and people support her “right to choose” to kill her own child in the following ways (paralleling many “pro-choice” arguments):
How dare you pass judgment on the woman, when you have no idea what she’s going through?
You’re a male, so you have no right to comment.
It’s the right of every 2yo to be wanted.
No one’s forcing you to kill your own 2yo.
Keep your church out of my home!
We’re not pro–killing-2yos, we’re pro-choice.
We want to make 2yo-killing safe, legal and rare.
If we make laws against this, then those who are rich enough will be able to hire a hit man to kill the toddler, while the poor could not afford this, so such laws would discriminate against the poor.
Unless you are prepared to adopt this child, you have no right to tell the mother that she should not kill her.
If we don’t make it possible for the mother to kill her 2yo safely, then she’ll do it unsafely and possibly put her own health in danger.
Laws against 2yo-killing would violate the woman’s right to privacy, which judges tell us is in the US Constitution.
It’s speciesist to give a Homo sapiens 2yo so much more protection than a chimpanzee 2yo.
You’re opposed to killing 2yos only because you’re a religious fanatic.
The child was conceived by incestuous rape, and her existence is a continual reminder to her mother of what happened, so she should die because of her father’s crime.
Stem cells could be harvested from this 2yo that could help cure many horrible diseases and disabilities—you religious fanatics want to stop this scientific research and cut off all hope of a cure for Alzheimer’s, heart disease, Parkinson’s, quadriplegia and diabetes.
Despite the pro-choice movement’s mantra of “women’s equality,” their ideas are a rebirth of the same demonic ideas that justified slavery, namely the dehumanization of an entire class of human beings based on randomly selected criteria for human value—criteria that is not value-giving in the first place.
So how do we account for this human equality that we all claim to care about? Only one way. Amidst our countless differences, there is only one thing that all human beings have in common: a shared human nature. If we don’t ground human value in our shared human nature, but rather in our differences, then we open the door to justifying all sorts of horrible actions to dehumanize others who don’t meet our subjective criteria.
If you care about human equality, the pro-life position is your only option because it says all human beings, whether born or unborn, are equal in value and dignity and ought to be treated as such.
So what would Jesus do?
Like He handled the adultery case ..
" ..Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” And again He bent down and wrote on the ground.
When they heard this, they began to go away one by one, beginning with the older ones, until only Jesus was left, with the woman standing there. Then Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are your accusers?Has no one condemned you?”
“No one, Lord,” she answered.
“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared.
" Now go and Sin No More"
The last line is important because He is pro life . See Psalm 139; Genesis 1:23 - " Go forth and Multiply "
God says that life is in His hands. He takes strong issue with those who believe they have the right to murder innocent children. In fact, God brought harsh judgment upon nations and Israel who offered their babies to false gods (2 Chronicles 28:3 - "and he made offerings in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom ( In Jerusalem) and burned his sons as an offering, according to the abominations of the nations whom the Lord drove out before the people of Israel."
Jeremiah 19:5- "They have built the high places of Baal to burn their sons in the fire as burnt offerings to Baal, which I did not command or decree, nor did it come into my mind"
Ezekiel 20:31- "When you present your gifts and offer up your children in fire, you defile yourselves with all your idols to this day")
Why do we imagine He is not equally outraged when we offer our babies to our gods of culture, money, fame, or convenience?
