robin van persie

Status
Not open for further replies.
citytill1die84 said:
MC ID said:
We are in the strange situation where we already have three amazing strikers and adding a fourth would simply not work for the team, as much as i'd love to see Van Persie in blue it couldn't work without causing massive problems for the team. someone would have to leave, and I really do like Dzeko Aguero and Balotelli a lot so i'd rather stick to them and let a young gun be fourth choice.

I agree but 3 strikers ain't enough for the games we are playing. To put pressure on a young kid to cover either Dzeko,Aguero or Balo wouldn't work. We Defo need a 4th striker we have been lucky with injuries so far but I 1 of the strikers gets injured were fooked. I believe a front 4 of the 3 we have and RVP would work perfectly well because Balo and RVP can play on the wings as well.

It's a good point but having 4 strikers who will all undoubtedly feel they should be the 1st name on any team sheet could cause problems, especially if one of the four gets relegated to carling cup duty. I think you're onto something with the winger point though, getting someone who can play on the wings primarily yet also play well as the main striker would serve us well. For me, Lavezzi would be a better choice because of this.

I will say though, if we got RVP and we managed to have all four strikers be fine with rotation I do believe i'd have a screaming orgasm.
 
I didn't realise how many ITK's we had following City until last nights game.

1st of January Van Persie is ours !
Van Perise is ours
Van Persie Is ours
 
There would be absolute uproar at the Emirates if this happened. Just can't see it myself.
All the speculation will die when he signs a new "ahem" improved contract with City allegedly sniffing after him.
 
problem is how do you rotate dzeko, aguerro, balotelli and van persie? It would be one of those weird situations like Dzeko where you score 4 goals and next game you are on the bench. Strikers need playing time, and you cant chop and change strikers every game, they will never get momentum. Believe it or not, there can be such thing as having too many players and the balance of the team being messed up.

Van Persie is a big striker, and if he comes, someone has to go. But lets say Van persie is replacement for Tevez, what is he replacing exactly 2-3 performance in in 4 months, or do people feel Dzeko, Aguerro and Baloteeli have played too much this season and want them to be rested even more?
 
I just think this would be a pointless purchase, if anything I'd rather we splash cash for a big time CB (like Thiago Silva) than a 4th world class striker.
 
Mancini has already said we won't be buying a striker in January but I think he'd be more tempted by Lavezzi than Van Persie if he changes his mind as Lavezzi is completely different to our three forwards.
 
allan harper said:
I didn't realise how many ITK's we had following City until last nights game.

1st of January Van Persie is ours !
Van Perise is ours
Van Persie Is ours

I was adjacent to the fence on Tuesday night with a copper between me and the Arsenal fans - I have got a brilliant photo of their faces when we sang ........

Van Perise is ours
Van Persie Is ours
Your our feeder club
Van Persie is ours
 
Calcio said:
problem is how do you rotate dzeko, aguerro, balotelli and van persie? It would be one of those weird situations like Dzeko where you score 4 goals and next game you are on the bench. Strikers need playing time, and you cant chop and change strikers every game, they will never get momentum. Believe it or not, there can be such thing as having too many players and the balance of the team being messed up.

That would be almost convincing if City weren't top of the league.
 
Ladyman persists!

-

Van Persie next on Man City wishlist as Mancini hails 'fantastic' Arsenal striker
By Ian Ladyman
Last updated at 10:28 PM on 16th December 2011


Roberto Mancini prepares to face Arsenal at the Etihad Stadium on Sunday increasingly determined to sign the Gunners' star striker Robin van Persie next summer.

The Manchester City manager has identified the Holland forward as the man to bring a little more potency and versatility to City's forward line next season.

Mancini knows he will face a battle to persuade Arsenal to sell, especially after the bitterness of last summer's protracted and ultimately successful pursuit of Samir Nasri.

But City are optimistic Van Persie, 28, will not sign a new deal at the Emirates, meaning Arsenal will be forced to sell in the summer as their captain will have only a year left on his contract.

City are not expected to sign any players in January but last night Mancini paid tribute to Van Persie's form that has seen him score 23 goals in 25 appearances for club and country this season.

Mancini said: 'Van Persie is incredible. He is like Sergio Aguero here for us. At the moment he is fantastic. To score all those goals is incredible.'
 
id like cavani to replace dzeko in the summer and hazard for tevez asap
not RVP to injury prone for me
 
Simply not true.

Convenient to let it stir for a number of reasons, but forget January.

As for the summer, again, City expressing a like for a player, and doing something about it, are two different things.

Van Persie is hardly going to dismiss the speculation with a new contract to be negotiated at Arsenal.

Too old, too expensive, too injury-prone and too convenient a story just a couple of days before a match between the two respective teams.

Ladyboy, Taylor, all of 'em, insisting Nasri wasn't coming to City...he was going to United.

Unless you read differently on here...

We have long-term, young, hungry targets on our scope.
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Simply not true.

Convenient to let it stir for a number of reasons, but forget January.

As for the summer, again, City expressing a like for a player, and doing something about it, are two different things.

Van Persie is hardly going to dismiss the speculation with a new contract to be negotiated at Arsenal.

Too old, too expensive, too injury-prone and too convenient a story just a couple of days before a match between the two respective teams.

Ladyboy, Taylor, all of 'em, insisting Nasri wasn't coming to City...he was going to United.

Unless you read differently on here...

We have long-term, young, hungry targets on our scope.
Anything in the pipeline for jan?
 
at least if we express an interest it could force arsenal to offer RVP more than they had planned :)
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...366/Man-City-line-up-30m-Van-Persie-raid.html
MANCHESTER CITY will offer Robin van Persie a £41.6MILLION deal to join them in the summer.
The mega-rich Prem leaders are convinced they will land the Arsenal hitman with a £30m bid.

City are comfortable that Van Persie will not sign a new contract at the Emirates and follow Gunners Samir Nasri, Kolo Toure and Gael Clichy to the Etihad.

Van Persie has just 18 months left on his £80,000-a-week contract but City are planning to offer him a four-year deal worth £200,000 a week.

The Dutch star, 28, will line up against City in Manchester for tomorrow's big match.

And he knows this summer will provide his last chance to make one last big-money move — and he will also realise he has more chance of winning silverware with City.

Van Persie only has one FA Cup winners' medal to show for his seven years at Arsenal.

He is in red-hot form and has 33 Premier League goals so far for Arsenal in 2011.

That puts him only one behind ex-Gunner Thierry Henry and four away from breaking Alan Shearer's record of 36 from 1995.
 
at200 said:
id like cavani to replace dzeko in the summer and hazard for tevez asap
not RVP to injury prone for me

How about Lavezzi & Hazard ?<br /><br />-- Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:45 pm --<br /><br />
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Simply not true.

Convenient to let it stir for a number of reasons, but forget January.

As for the summer, again, City expressing a like for a player, and doing something about it, are two different things.

Van Persie is hardly going to dismiss the speculation with a new contract to be negotiated at Arsenal.

Too old, too expensive, too injury-prone and too convenient a story just a couple of days before a match between the two respective teams.

Ladyboy, Taylor, all of 'em, insisting Nasri wasn't coming to City...he was going to United.

Unless you read differently on here...

We have long-term, young, hungry targets on our scope.

Any hints ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top