Rochdale v. Mini-me Rags

LongsightM13 said:
I've said it before but still people like Oliver Holt in the Mirror keep extolling them as 'football's conscience'. They are NOT a breakaway club. A breakaway club is AFC Wimbledon, they have severed all ties with the 'parent' club. You would never get AFC Wimbledon fans cheering on MK Dons and vice versa.
Not so with FC United of Bury. They are simply a Happy Shopper version of the 'real thing'. Their fans still support 'Big United' as they laughably call them. They have not 'broken away'. They have just decided they don't want to pay Premier League admission money, but they'll still watch them on ther box. Some even go to watch both sides.
They are effectively a franchise (in the retail sense, rather than the American sport definition) of the rags operating in non-league football. What are the chances of FC United of Dublin or Singapore in the future?
They are not, as they try to portray themselves, as rebels of conscience or social activitists, the sons of Peterloo. They are a bunch of disloyal, pompous, self-important gobshites and splitters, formed by empire-building fanzine writers who want to look important but found their egos and status bruised when organisations like MUST stole their limelight.
They are watched by obese twats who long for the days when 'The Red Army' used to kick off in shopping centres in Plymouth and Southampton, and so bring their black Primark-clad, rodent-featured offspring along to show them how 'United' can terrorise long-standing, traditional non-league clubs with a real identity and history. You know, the very ones they could have gone to watch if all they really yearned for was a return to 'proper' grass roots football. We are not short on non-league clubs in Greater Manchester and I'm sure the likes of Trafford Borough or Salford City would have been grateful for the extra support.
But then they couldn't guarantee they would win every week, which is what they demanded. So they had to set up a club vastly richer than its rivals so they could steamroller teams in the lower levels of the football pyramid. After all, there's no point watching your team if they're not top of the league, is there? After all, Chelsea were winning everything in the Premier League at that time and it was no fun for a plastic, so lets have a new team that wins all the time instead.
They are a joke

That's pretty much bang on the money, Longsight.

I know a Man United season ticket holder from Ramsbottom who goes to all their games.

Doesn't that defeat the object somewhat?

The vast majority of United fans chose United because they win every week and get the biggest crowds. This is a little extension of it.

And if I ever meet a Blue who goes to watch them I'll tell him what I think of him.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
LongsightM13 said:
I've said it before but still people like Oliver Holt in the Mirror keep extolling them as 'football's conscience'. They are NOT a breakaway club. A breakaway club is AFC Wimbledon, they have severed all ties with the 'parent' club. You would never get AFC Wimbledon fans cheering on MK Dons and vice versa.
Not so with FC United of Bury. They are simply a Happy Shopper version of the 'real thing'. Their fans still support 'Big United' as they laughably call them. They have not 'broken away'. They have just decided they don't want to pay Premier League admission money, but they'll still watch them on ther box. Some even go to watch both sides.
They are effectively a franchise (in the retail sense, rather than the American sport definition) of the rags operating in non-league football. What are the chances of FC United of Dublin or Singapore in the future?
They are not, as they try to portray themselves, as rebels of conscience or social activitists, the sons of Peterloo. They are a bunch of disloyal, pompous, self-important gobshites and splitters, formed by empire-building fanzine writers who want to look important but found their egos and status bruised when organisations like MUST stole their limelight.
They are watched by obese twats who long for the days when 'The Red Army' used to kick off in shopping centres in Plymouth and Southampton, and so bring their black Primark-clad, rodent-featured offspring along to show them how 'United' can terrorise long-standing, traditional non-league clubs with a real identity and history. You know, the very ones they could have gone to watch if all they really yearned for was a return to 'proper' grass roots football. We are not short on non-league clubs in Greater Manchester and I'm sure the likes of Trafford Borough or Salford City would have been grateful for the extra support.
But then they couldn't guarantee they would win every week, which is what they demanded. So they had to set up a club vastly richer than its rivals so they could steamroller teams in the lower levels of the football pyramid. After all, there's no point watching your team if they're not top of the league, is there? After all, Chelsea were winning everything in the Premier League at that time and it was no fun for a plastic, so lets have a new team that wins all the time instead.
They are a joke

That's pretty much bang on the money, Longsight.

I know a Man United season ticket holder from Ramsbottom who goes to all their games.

Doesn't that defeat the object somewhat?

The vast majority of United fans chose United because they win every week and get the biggest crowds. This is a little extension of it.

And if I ever meet a Blue who goes to watch them I'll tell him what I think of him.

Dont say owt til half time though eh ?? ;)
 
davymcfc said:
weejh said:
just speaking with my best maye, who is an fc fan. he says there isnt any anti-city singing, and my city mate who went to the last fc game with him v barrow confirmed this. i hope they win, got a soft spot for them. i know the reasons why my mate started supporting them and support him for choosing to do it. sorry if that annoys other blues.....
i respect you from when you joined this board but this statement is fuckin ridiculous. go swivel

told my fc mate that i was getting pelters on here,and he still claims that there is "hardly any" anti-city songs, he has back tracked a bit. however he did say that when utd aren't playing at home fc's gates go up, and all the extra utd fans do sing them, although he also claims that "real,original" fc fans have little or no interest in the premiership and city. i am just letting u know how he sees it. thanks for respecting me for when i joined this board, that means a lot....
 
Blues who "support", "have a soft spot for" and "respect" FC United?

I've fucking heard it all now.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Blues who "support", "have a soft spot for" and "respect" FC United?

I've fucking heard it all now.

I have a soft spot for em tbh...



























It's called my arsehole...
 
Many years ago, a rag who would sadly later go on to become my brother in law (from Stockport, oh the irony) fetched up at the former Palace nightclub in Levenshulme with his mate 'Andy', a speccy, acne-riddled creature with lank , greasy hair, who proudly introduced himself as 'one of the top United fanzine writers'. A complete twat who I very nearly slapped later in the evening when he kept banging on to me about City fans 'disrespecting' the Munich air disaster, — and then denied outright that City goalkeeping legend Frank Swift also died in the crash. I was only dissuaded from doing so by said Rag-in-law and my brother.
I think this twat is now the chief executive if FSCUM
 
Most club secretary's at this level do the job for free, for the love of the club, maybe expenses... the guy that runs the Fuckems clears about 30 grand a year doing the same job.

Go figure.

He was the same mug that was on our telly screens every night during the Glazers takeover extolling the virtues of his "One Love".

And while the main fanzines at the Rags were totally in support of the establishment of the FCUM's, not a single one of them packed it in at OT and became a FCUM fanzine.

No sirree, they just sell the same fanzine at both grounds.

Principles are one thing... but making a buck is far more important even to the fanzines!

And didn't the FCUM's also say that they were opting out of sponshorship and commercialisation of football, and that they would never change the time of the match just to accommodate television coverage?

Now we've got their spokesman telling everyone how wonderful it is that they are on the box, receiving circa £70,000...

Hypocrites, the fucking lot of them.
 
We should let FC play in our athletics stadium on the condition they have a huge banner up every game declaring their undying debt to us.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.