Surely that's if they are put on military sites and locations known to be targets. If they are put up in a hotel in downtown Kyiv, it's on putin if decides to nuke it?Using them as human shields is against the Geneva convention & rightly so
This was my point.That doesn’t respond directly to my point though. I get the illegality of keeping POWs in a specific area to act as a shield, such as next to an ammunition dump, but an urban area is surely too wide and nebulous to be enforceable as a war crime.
Using them as human shields is against the Geneva convention & rightly so
So what's happening to these Ruskie troops?
Obviously BS from the RF MOD yeah?
It wouldn't be civilians using soldiers as shields, it would be the Ukraine government who have an obligation under the Geneva convention and would put the Western governments in a position that they would not be able to support and thus end all supportI think that applies to soldiers using civilians as shields.
Not sure it caters for civilians using soldiers as shields...
You can just see the cogs going on in his brainLyman is in Donetsk region which was declared as a russian territory yesterday. Today it's back where it belongs in Ukraine. ****, Cossacks just took back your territory. aren't you suppose to nuke them?