yeseye
Well-Known Member
I’m astonished they used a City photo tbh..
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
There are people in their 40s-70s who sit in other parts of the ground who don't want to stand all the game. Given the choice I like to stand in exciting moments and sit for the rest. I don't get why you wanted someone to take your seat out. You could have stood before, and you have to stand now. You've made your conditions worse imo.I’m astonished they used a City photo tbh..
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
Can't see that happening. The few times I've had tickets in level one, I didn't find the view particularly great. Especially looking at the far side of the pitch. The corporates would prefer level 2, which is partially corporate already.That will never ever happen mate. East level 1 is more likely to go corporate than safe standing
Im in 105 which is already partly corporate at the back for league games and even more so on CL nights, when loads of is seasoncard holders are punted out of our regular seats to make way for UEFA sponsor freeloadersCan't see that happening. The few times I've had tickets in level one, I didn't find the view particularly great. Especially looking at the far side of the pitch. The corporates would prefer level 2, which is partially corporate already.
WhyI’m astonished they used a City photo tbh..
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
BBC using a City image in a headline with the word Ban In it . Subtle but deliberate I think.I’m astonished they used a City photo tbh..
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
Would love that!I’m astonished they used a City photo tbh..
I would like to see the whole 1st level made standing right the way around the stadium.
Why what?