Scolari

mmc

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 Mar 2008
Messages
351
What do you reckon ? Would he be a success here ?

I doubt he is going to be a Chelsea for much longer, the fuss he has made about a transfer budget would be non-existent if he came here also we have Robinho to tempt him. Would be a good successor for Mark Hughes (Who i'm getting extremely tired of his excuses)
 
mmc said:
What do you reckon ? Would he be a success here ?

I doubt he is going to be a Chelsea for much longer, the fuss he has made about a transfer budget would be non-existent if he came here also we have Robinho to tempt him. Would be a good successor for Mark Hughes (Who i'm getting extremely tired of his excuses)


So Scolari isn't making excuses when he talks about the lack of a transfer budget?
 
Chelsea fans are really not happy with this guy... This is his first club managers job in Europe. Not convinced by him meself.
 
Chelsea have some problems. At the moment they really don't look like a league winning side.

That said it would be a mistake in my view to get rid of Scolari, both now and at the end of the season.

Firstly, if you get rid of someone, you have to have a replacement who will improve the situation lined up and ready to take over. That is unlikely to be possible mid season, and even more so given the likely upheaval and disruption a mid-season sacking would cause. Even this summer getting someone with a pedigree better than Scolari's is going to be difficult.

Secondly, Chelsea's current problems stem in large part from chopping and changing at the top. They sacked Mourinho after having undermined his authority, then appointed a lame duck manager for a whole season, then changed again this summer. That is a long time to go without a manager who is in control of the team's direction, the transfer policy and so on.

If they had a sporting director with real authority, like some continental clubs do, (e.g. Galliani at AC Milan), this might not be such a problem. BUt there are some structural problems with that Chelsea team and if you keep chopping and changing managers they will never get resolved: someone needs to be appointed and given the time and resources to shape and mould his own team. Sacking Scolari would be a disaster because what you are saying is 'we want immediate results'. That will only engender short-termism in the management team, whoever that may be. It also leads to far too much player power (Lampard, Terry and Drogba anyone?)

Ok, they are a top 4 team, but the way they have been managed over the past 2 seasons (and here I mean at the very top, i.e. Roman, Kenyon etc) it should be no surprise that they are struggling to compete with the rags, who by contrast are very well managed by a secure management team who have a mandate to identify problems and the resources and time to solve them - as well as enough backing and goodwill to take tough decisions. Top teams are not immune from the requirement to be well managed and have a bit of stability. Blame Scolari if you like, but a lot of his problems are inherited and he has not yet had the time to sort them out. Will he get it? Probably not...
 
Scolari, for all his merits, would be a shit manager for City. Not that there's any chance he's coming of course. I've never been that keen on Hughes but I genuinely think we need to stick with him, there's a lot of stuff behind the scenes he's correcting and if we persevere we'll reap the benefits. Fully understandable why people want him out, I was of the same opinion until recently but what I've heard from someone who knows we should stick with him.
 
paddystyle said:
i'm just tired of having a different manager every year,new methods,new signings same results,not a huge fan of hughes but he's the man with the plan so i say let him be

this to me seems to be the most important part of what some seem to be missing,not just hughes but ADUG,we may just see some of this plan come together by the end of the window and hopefully get on with the rest of the season.

i allso was reading the other day cant remember what article it was but it was about robinho and how scolari wanted him badly and saying that if robinho was at chelsea they may just have been way ahead in the league of which i think knackered them up a hell of a lot in him coming to us and i really do belive this to be very true.
 
A lesson here for those creaming for an overseas manager with an exotic name just because he has won honours abroad. Grass is greener and all that.
 
Scolari just doesnt seem to care about Chelsea and why Deco is keeping his place is beyond me, he has been dog shit for months now! They really do need Essien back, they're squad will be fucked in a few years once they are all the wrong side of 30 and arent splashing the cash like they used too!
 
I honestly think they got mixed up. Scolari would of done well taking over sven at city with a flaire side

Also I think hughes would of got a good response with chelsea grinding out results
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top