Semi or the Final...

The final.
Though the semi wasn't a bad day out, it would have been meaningless if we didn't finish the job.
The big difference was that we were underdogs for the semi, but hot favourites for the final, so our expectations were probably very different beforehand and that had an effect on how we viewed both games.
 
As great as the semi was, it would have been a hollow victory if we'd lost the final. So the Final it is, without a shadow of a doubt.
 
Hmm it's a tough one that's for sure.

Upon reflection I would have to say the Final.

From a City point of view lots of us were thinking after we beat utd, wouldn't it be typical City if we lost to Stoke? In that sense typical City died at the final and that has such far reaching consequences, that even beating utd cannot surpass it..

From a personal point of view, when we scored I lost it to an extent where I was not in control of myself. The only time I've ever been anything like that was when Morley scored at Bradford. That reaction tells me that winning the cup meant more to me than beating utd in the semi.
 
Went to both games but for me the semi was better.

As fantastic as it was seeing us lift the cup, I went to that game expecting to win whereas I thought the scum would beat us in the semi.

Also the semi was my first ever time in Wembley and I was more drunk before and during the game.
 
The semi. Both will stay with me forever, but I honestly couldn't see us winning the semi, and couldn't see us losing the final.

Only been to wembley 3 times, these two and '99. Anyone else 3 from 3?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.