Sergio Aguero

Status
Not open for further replies.
zangatangring said:
Chick Counterfly said:
Zangatangaring; you remind me of me. Not a good sign.

anyway;

If Messi-Tevez-Aguero doesn't work, at all, ever, for Argentina, then why would anyone spend ungodly amounts to put Aguero and Tevez together at club level?

And I wonder if one of the intended subtexts of the Corinthians saga was Team Kiarlos sending City a gentle reminder that he's gone on strike previously in order to force a move....


Well, the argentina coach Sergio Batista was using an imitation Barcelona approach. Tevez and messi are both false nines, big mistake. However, don't doubt his intelligence. It was probably a compromise to field the most popular players. Dax777's (who, i must say, is very tactically aware) thoughts on page 202 of this thread will show you what i mean.

If we did get aguero, his creativity as a striker will certainly be most viable as a replacement for Tevez. So what are we doing? Paying Lots of cash to refine our squad. What's the point? tevez is already a proven false nine. Everyone here'll know exactly how much of a catalyst he is in attack.

Please, can you tell me exactly how i remind you of yourself?

-- Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:01 pm --

gazbaz said:
Far too young at the time of the movie release to remember any of the nuances of Ali G's quotes. I think you misunderstand, some of your comments are derisory. Some people, not just me, may find them offensive. Insidious, i believe is the word. Oh sorry, i forgot, let's use 'ignorant.'


Right, I really dont know what you are on about now. Can you please enlighten me as to which of my comments you find derisory and/or ignorant ?

You were asking for advice earlier with respect to how to write a post on here.

1. Dont use 5 words when you can use 1, or you will sound like a pretentious tit.
2. Get a sense of humour

I asked if English was your first language not to take the piss, but because you seem to be misreading the nuances in some of the replies to your posts.

Why was my question about Chris Eubank 'ironic' ?

No need for such strong language is there? I never used such language and i don't plan on doing so. I honestly don't understand how you can't fathom that what you're doing could possibly create conflict. Jeez....... Either your slow; or just trying to annoy me. Also note that it wasn't just me who said this.

Look at the previous 'jokes' you made and explain to me exactly why they're funny. If you can't present me with a valid and logical argument after really assimilating (sorry, couldn't find another word) what you just did. Then, please, just drop it.

Is this a homework project, or are you Brian Sewell?
 
lancs blue said:
N-Word-Joe said:
zangatangring said:
Well, the argentina coach Sergio Batista was using an imitation Barcelona approach. Tevez and messi are both false nines, big mistake. However, don't doubt his intelligence. It was probably a compromise to field the most popular players. Dax777's (who, i must say, is very tactically aware) thoughts on page 202 of this thread will show you what i mean.

If we did get aguero, his creativity as a striker will certainly be most viable as a replacement for Tevez. So what are we doing? Paying Lots of cash to refine our squad. What's the point? tevez is already a proven false nine. Everyone here'll know exactly how much of a catalyst he is in attack.

Please, can you tell me exactly how i remind you of yourself?

-- Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:01 pm --



No need for such strong language is there? I never used such language and i don't plan on doing so. I honestly don't understand how you can't fathom that what you're doing could possibly create conflict. Jeez....... Either your slow; or just trying to annoy me. Also note that it wasn't just me who said this.

Look at the previous 'jokes' you made and explain to me exactly why they're funny. If you can't present me with a valid and logical argument after really assimilating (sorry, couldn't find another word) what you just did. Then, please, just drop it.

why not use that vast vocabulary of yours to think of one, i know i can .....

but either way, its not a dick measuring contest, why are you trying to belittle people by using large, or if not complex, uncommon words? there's no point in trying to act the victim and tell people not to use such hostile language towards you, if you are, by all evidence, just trying to actually be what they are calling you .... a pretentious tit.

now i know a hell of a lot of incredibly clever people, they know large words also, but they are intelligent as to the scenario of which they tend to use them, your just putting in unnecessarily large words to try and come off as a intelligent guy, which you probably are .... but it takes a far more intelligent person to know when to use those large words and when not to ..... you "my friend" ARE a pretentious tit and i don't offer any apologies as to jumping into the little argument either.

FFS, slagging someone off for using words of more than 2 syllables in a post, BM reaches a new low.


Read it again, and then read everything the subject has said in this thread. You'll find he'll be proven correct.
 
bluemoon201164 said:
lancs blue said:
N-Word-Joe said:
why not use that vast vocabulary of yours to think of one, i know i can .....

but either way, its not a dick measuring contest, why are you trying to belittle people by using large, or if not complex, uncommon words? there's no point in trying to act the victim and tell people not to use such hostile language towards you, if you are, by all evidence, just trying to actually be what they are calling you .... a pretentious tit.

now i know a hell of a lot of incredibly clever people, they know large words also, but they are intelligent as to the scenario of which they tend to use them, your just putting in unnecessarily large words to try and come off as a intelligent guy, which you probably are .... but it takes a far more intelligent person to know when to use those large words and when not to ..... you "my friend" ARE a pretentious tit and i don't offer any apologies as to jumping into the little argument either.

FFS, slagging someone off for using words of more than 2 syllables in a post, BM reaches a new low.

this.

no that wasn't what i was getting at mate, i didnt slag him off for using large words, just the way he has used them .... the way he called another poster "slow" because he didnt understand them, belittling that poster by being a pretentious tit - ie: if you dont get my big words you must be slow and i shall keep on using big words in my following posts to make you seem as such

by all means use the largest most uncommon words you can think of, just dont start being, as he called other posters, "ignorant" to your own flaws and compound them whilst judging others.

but great for sticking up for somebody, even if you did misinterpret what i was saying.
 
This is the Telegraph blurb alluded to.

City want to sign Atlético Madrid’s Sergio Agüero as Tévez’s eventual replacement and are close to a €45 million agreement.
 
Any chance that the Oxford Union Debating Society can stop throwing their sherry over each other's blazers and allow we poor inner city comprehensive types to discuss association football?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.