Here's a view from a red and I'm being as fair as I can.
Firstly I can understand him wanting to fight his corner, it's actually admirable. For those to say he was fitted up I think that's just too far fetched.
Mike Summerbee was the first to mention stats, he said City had had 60% of possesion and more chances on goal. How would Sky know in advance he was going to say this in order to make him look wrong? I suppose they could have altered the figures quickly after he mentioned stats himself, but why would they? Even if Sky were out by a few and City had more possesion, it makes them both wrong surely. If the correct stats were eg 53% City, they stil would have shown him being wrong as it wasn't 60% the number that Mike quoted. The guy hosting the show even made the point of saying "They agree with what you're saying Mike as they both had 10 chances, Utd had 5 on target and City 3". He actually said this even though Mike had said City had more chances. So they may both had been out somewhat but I can't see an agenda. Sky want viewing figures but I seriously doubt they try to 'fit up' guests as it serves no purpose.
His loyalty was admirable but as a pundit he should be getting his facts right also rather than making them up. Sky should have the correct stats also. If Sky hadn't displayed any stats then other people may have been as annoyed as some on here are, as Mike would have told the nation the wrong stats also. I'm not trying to be argumentative as everyone has their own interpretation, but I see no purpose in fitting somebody up?