JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Hmmm, what about drink driving, domestic violence, pissheads fighting innocent people...alcohol abuse has a lot of passive victims
and they get punished for it, so your point is?
Hmmm, what about drink driving, domestic violence, pissheads fighting innocent people...alcohol abuse has a lot of passive victims
and they get punished for it, so your point is?
I'm guessing his point is drinking isn't banned despite the mayhem it can cause.
and they get punished for it, so your point is?
well it's a daft point really, as those things are punished as are the instances where smoking particularly affects others.
There's a clue in the thread title you fuckin balloonHmmm, what about drink driving, domestic violence, pissheads fighting innocent people...alcohol abuse has a lot of passive victims
No its a perfectly valid point. One is permitted/encouraged/sold/accepted whereas the other is banned.
There's a clue in the thread title you fuckin balloon
His point was in reply to a poster that claimed drinking only affected those that indulge.
My point is a response to the ridiculous statement...no one dies from passive drinking, which is frankly a stupid thing to sayand they get punished for it, so your point is?