blue_robb
Well-Known Member
One of the selling points behind the training regime is supposedly a reduced risk of player injury, particularly muscle injuries.
Star-laden squad? You mean Robinho and SWP, and possibly Kompany who is having to play out of position, because of the sheer inadequacy of our current midfieldJohnMaddocksAxe said:Marvin said:Blackburn's squad was regarded as the fittest in the Premiership.
Yesterday's result should have shocked no one. Take the few stars out of City's team and we are left with very average and mis-matched players
It took Martin O'Neill 3 seasons to produce a decent team. Hughes imherited a weak team, and has had literally days to strengthen it. And in the meantime the old players have had half a season of constant speculation as to who will be replacing them. Even players like Dunne, Richards and Hart are enduring speculation about new signings replacing them
Hughes needs time. What I have heard suggests to me that the problems are coming from key players who created problems for the last manager which he chose to ignore.
At least half the league has squads of 'very average players'. The only difference being that they don't have the 'few stars' mentioned. Yet even without these stars they are producing better results than Hughes and his star laden squad.
Also, Paul Ince, Sammy Lee, Sam Alladyce, Chris Hutchings and several others had the same amount of time as Hughes to mould their squad, their weaker squads, as Hughes has.
They took their team's to a relegation battle - they got sacked. They did not bleat about all the players being a special type of bastard or that they can only work if they are allowed to bring in a new squad that is worth millions more than most other squads.
And guess what, the new managers that came in managed to get more out of the existing squad than the manager's that had taken them to the brink of the relegation zone.
LEE BRADBURY said:I believe we are now using similar training methods as used by Bayern ****** and Real Madrid so they must work,
dchitz said:LEE BRADBURY said:I have heard that some senior squad players have a problem with MH training methods and feel they could be contributing to player’s injuries? Some players feel the training is too intense and are finding it tough going, they are feeling tired and lethargic prior to matches?
It could explain some of the performances off late? I believe we are now using similar training methods as used by Bayern ****** and Real Madrid so they must work, these training methods seem to have caused of a lot of bad feeling in our dressing room though, one star player is regularly over looked because he never performs in training which the fans don’t see.
I heard one player got his missus to phone MH to say he had a cold, and the club sent some one around his house.
Maybe some of these players simply are not up to it, that might explain the don’t give a shit attitude that some off them have, so basically they are trying to stitch MH up and hope he gets the sack, get the nice easy training routines of old back.
I think there could be some truth in this.
All the more reason to get behind our manager
Read a similar story mate but its interesting too note that swp and stevie have been two of our best players and both praised his methods so what gives???
LEE BRADBURY said:I heard one player got his missus to phone MH to say he had a cold, and the club sent some one around his house.
A good post that mate and you make a very interesting point.TheMightyQuinn said:If we can all lose our obsession with how much footballers earn and look at this logically then things will become clearer.
It appears that Hughes and our squad are largely incompatible. Now, some of you seem to think that we should give Hughes X amount of time to buy players he can work with yet this isnt the answer at all. A good man manager can get the best out of playboys and humble everymen alike. The fact Hughes can only motivate or work with one kind of player simply shows how limited he is as a manager, some would say person.
Look at Ferguson, we may as well considering the fact that most people who rate Hughes do so on the assumption that he learned from him, he gets the best out of humble players like Scholes, utter cretins like Gay Nev and arrogant tossers like Cuntona. Would the rags have had any success at all if Ferguson could only coach ONE kind of player?
JohnMaddocksAxe said:Total speculation, rumour and 'I heard this' bollocks.
Also completely absolves the management team from any responsibility for our shocking results and performances once again.
What makes you think that this squad of players is somehow so different to every other squad of players in the country and are suddenly the only bunch of wankers who cannot hack it and do not care?
The odds on them being this way, opposite to every other football team, and at the same time being quite happy to flush their own careers down the pan are a lot, lot longer than it just being that the management team have failed in getting their management techniques to get anything like maximum performance from thier players.
This must be the first instance in history where people see good/average players not performing on mass and buy into the ridiculous theory that they must all be wankers or not up to and it's nothing to do with the manager.
When exactly does it become his responsibility then? When he is able to replace half the squad? What other manager's in history have had this luxary?