bewildered
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 320
Someone mentioned the rugby refs earlier and it got me thinking while watching the incident again.
In rugby, when they review a decision they look at all aspects in the run up to an incident. In this case what actually should have happened is that the referee should have awarded a penalty to us for the pull back on Laporte.
If that had happened then I could accept the process but the corrupt bastards are picking and choosing so that we are always disadvantaged.
It’s destroying the game
In rugby, when they review a decision they look at all aspects in the run up to an incident. In this case what actually should have happened is that the referee should have awarded a penalty to us for the pull back on Laporte.
If that had happened then I could accept the process but the corrupt bastards are picking and choosing so that we are always disadvantaged.
It’s destroying the game