I'm not sold on the at the back. Two main reasons:
WBs limit the opportunities for wingers to play really wide and stretch the defence, and I would rather it was Sané and Sterling occupying those areas.
Our three best CBs don't have the passing range you need for it to work. To me, it feels like a wasted man in defence - unlike when you have transitioned into three at the back, with 2CBs and one very deep midfielder.
I'm sure we'll use 352 often enough, and it will work, but it doesn't feel as effective as 433.
WBs limit the opportunities for wingers to play really wide and stretch the defence, and I would rather it was Sané and Sterling occupying those areas.
Our three best CBs don't have the passing range you need for it to work. To me, it feels like a wasted man in defence - unlike when you have transitioned into three at the back, with 2CBs and one very deep midfielder.
I'm sure we'll use 352 often enough, and it will work, but it doesn't feel as effective as 433.