Skashion said:Is this meant to be some sort of an attempt at a wind up?JoeMercer'sWay said:waiting for Natalie Portman to turn up? Or are you more a Carrie Fisher kind of guy?
GStar said:Fair enough...
Anyway, do we actually know the circumstances around the theft? Putting 100% blame of the 'thief' i still think is a simple (and wrong) way out.
Swordfish7 said:Maybe because it is such a poor analogy. It was not cash it was fucking paper tickets that can be cancelled and reprinted. They were not left by an open window, they were stolen from a van.
GStar said:It's a comodity with a value.
Switch 'cash' for whatever you want, change 'open window' for whatever you like; the analogy stays the same... give someone an opportunity and they'll take it.
Does that mean there's no blame placed on anything or anyone other than the 'thief'?
SWP's back said:GStar said:Fair enough...
Anyway, do we actually know the circumstances around the theft? Putting 100% blame of the 'thief' i still think is a simple (and wrong) way out.
Haha - call me old fashioned but without a thief, it is difficult for a theft to ever acheive its destiny.
SWP's back said:GStar said:It's a comodity with a value.
Switch 'cash' for whatever you want, change 'open window' for whatever you like; the analogy stays the same... give someone an opportunity and they'll take it.
Does that mean there's no blame placed on anything or anyone other than the 'thief'?
As you say, we don't yet know the circumstances. Hence JMW stating "what a joke" was wrong.
GStar said:SWP's back said:As you say, we don't yet know the circumstances. Hence JMW stating "what a joke" was wrong.
That wasn't quite the point i was trying to make - it was more towards the posters who said the blame could only lie at the theif and not the people or the processes around the whole thing.