Suella Braverman - sacked as Home Secretary (p394)

Are you really concerned about tax payers expense? The woman who is in charge of making sure claims are being processed isn’t doing her job hence more expenses to the tax payer.

This isn’t a chicken or the egg argument.
It’s because she is being hamstrung at every turn. Forget Brexit, that has been stripped down due to globalisation and Marxist ESGs. On a positive note, Blackrock seem to changing tack which hopefully usher in a new a new way to roll out sovereignty.
 
It’s because she is being hamstrung at every turn. Forget Brexit, that has been stripped down due to globalisation and Marxist ESGs. On a positive note, Blackrock seem to changing tack which hopefully usher in a new a new way to roll out sovereignty.
She wouldn’t be hamstrung at every turn if the policies she tries to implement weren’t illegal.
Brexit hasn’t been stripped down due to globalisation and Marxist ESGs (whatever they are). It’s failing because it’s had to face up to the real world rather than staying in the fantasy world of sunlit uplands and unicorns.
 
She wouldn’t be hamstrung at every turn if the policies she tries to implement weren’t illegal.
Brexit hasn’t been stripped down due to globalisation and Marxist ESGs (whatever they are). It’s failing because it’s had to face up to the real world rather than staying in the fantasy world of sunlit uplands and unicorns.

So just what I said about Blackrock then. Virtue Signalling actually doesn’t make money in the real world.

As for being illegal. Can you explain what is illegal about millions being spent on hotels and the barge they are now being housed in? I’m not for the removal of the court of human rights, but flying people back to Rwanda? Get a grip
 
So just what I said about Blackrock then. Virtue Signalling actually doesn’t make money in the real world.

As for being illegal. Can you explain what is illegal about millions being spent on hotels and the barge they are now being housed in? I’m not for the removal of the court of human rights, but flying people back to Rwanda? Get a grip
Not being flown ‘back’ to Rawanda, they were being shipped off to Rawanda which did indeed turn out to be illegal.If they weren’t incompetent and spent money on doing their job properly,there would be no need to spend millions on illegal and dubious schemes.
 
Not being flown ‘back’ to Rawanda, they were being shipped off to Rawanda which did indeed turn out to be illegal.If they weren’t incompetent and spent money on doing their job properly,there would be no need to spend millions on illegal and dubious schemes.
So you mean like.. not letting them in in the first place?
 
So just what I said about Blackrock then. Virtue Signalling actually doesn’t make money in the real world.

As for being illegal. Can you explain what is illegal about millions being spent on hotels and the barge they are now being housed in? I’m not for the removal of the court of human rights, but flying people back to Rwanda? Get a grip
I have no idea what you’re on about regarding Blackrock and virtue signalling.

Your second paragraph makes no sense to me either unfortunately. I have no idea why you are asking me about spending millions on hotels as if it’s something Braverman wants to do and is being prevented.

Her biggest problem is that her policies don’t address the issues that they are supposed to solve. They are there simply to stoke culture wars and wind up people like you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.