squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
Yeah I didn’t see it that way. What a mistake we made£20 million a year wasted, especially when Klopp and most of the Liverpool team apparently do it all for free.
Yeah I didn’t see it that way. What a mistake we made£20 million a year wasted, especially when Klopp and most of the Liverpool team apparently do it all for free.
I’m with you, mate. Thought it was pretty close overall. I certainly had my heart in my mouth enough for it not to be a cakewalk.Not fishing, thought it at the time.
Maybe i need to rewatch the whole game?
Some of their flicks and movement was exceptional, then it got to HendersonI’m with you, mate. Thought it was pretty close overall. I certainly had my heart in my mouth enough for it not to be a cakewalk.
We should really put in an effort to make this the new manc general shorthand for ****ing something up after decent work from others in a team effort.Then it got to Henderson
Seriously ......Tbh honest i thought Liverpool were the better team after about fifteen minutes, then we had a purple patch when scoring, then we were under the cosh slightly
We should really put in an effort to make this the new manc general shorthand for ****ing something up after decent work from others in a team effort.
I think it could stick.
In what way did city change? They change to 4 2 3 1 mid second half I presume cos getting no joyYes, it wasn't that they were better, but that they forced City to change.
It’s been the narrative in the media mate.In what way did city change? They change to 4 2 3 1 mid second half I presume cos getting no joy
You may have an easier time reading this thread if you assume nearly everything is said in jest. ;-)In what way did city change? They change to 4 2 3 1 mid second half I presume cos getting no joy