Tax cuts

They’ll just go and live in another country.
Like the scruffy owner of that circus just outside Manchester?
A few might piss off abroad but the vast majority will suck it up and stay. Some may even stop looking for ways to avoid the increased tax bill (both legal and illegal) and contribute to the state, but that's not the mentality of your beloved super-rich is it.
 
Like the scruffy owner of that circus just outside Manchester?
A few might piss off abroad but the vast majority will suck it up and stay. Some may even stop looking for ways to avoid the increased tax bill (both legal and illegal) and contribute to the state, but that's not the mentality of your beloved super-rich is it.
Unfortunately, post-Brexit, we’ve already saddled ourselves with additional layers of costly regulation and introducing an uncompetitive tax structure on top of that would prove entirely counterproductive.
 
If there is no appetite to revisiting the relationship with the European Union, then I can only imagine the next U.K. government will seek to introduce some form of health insurance payment. It won't technically be a tax, but once accepted it will rise rapidly and free up other tax revenue to be spent elsewhere.
 
It needs to be ring-fenced. Everything has been cut: The armed forces, police, council subsidies, health services you name it and it’s been cut under this wank government. If an incoming govt were to say we’re raising income tax to 30% and out of the proceeds we are going to spend an extra 10bn each year on the following - year 1. Health Service, year 2. Police and armed forces, year 3. Councils, year 4. Prison service etc. These things need to be prioritised or if not these they need to stipulate what is being prioritised.
If people can see vast improvements in their way of life as a result then they’re not going to begrudge paying a few quid more for it.
 
When i first started work income tax was 33% of my wages and i was happy about that as we had decent public services. You could see a Doctor, a Dentist, there were libraries and youth clubs, the roads were decent to drive on, potholes were rare. local government had money to spend on essential services like mental health provision etc etc.

Tax cuts are always proclaimed by the Tories as giving you more money in your pocket, which is fair, but if you get an extra quid in your pocket a week from the cut whilst a person earning a Million gets lots more quids in their pocket how is that fair?

Tories also like to use the Laffer curve as a reason why taxation on the rich does not work.

The Laffer Curve states that if tax rates are increased above a certain level, then tax revenues can actually fall because higher tax rates discourage people from working, Ergo lower taxes mean you will slave your arse off working for a crap company paying you minimum wage.

Laffer though was a fucking idiot, a discredited economist, he took no account of the tax paying base and its based on everyone paying a single tax rate.

There has never been a conclusive study that demonstrates a connection between lowered tax rates on the wealthy and GDP growth or increased tax receipts. During the 1940s and the 1970s, the top marginal tax rate was anywhere between 70 percent and 94 percent. In this same period, we experienced the largest GDP growth our country has ever seen, and we were able to invest in the future of our children, economy and environment.


After the 1980s, when the top marginal tax rate began its steady decline, we haven’t seen nearly the GDP gains that we saw during our post-World War II boom.

Why then, here is the question.


Do you support tax cuts?
Doesn’t the U.K. currently have the highest tax burden that it’s had in 70 years?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.