tevez deal

[PaoloB]

if we pay that kia bloke wot he wants does that then mean tevez will belong to city or will it be aa loan like the rags did?

 

[Tez Tosterone]

if we pay that kia bloke wot he wants does that then mean tevez will belong to city or will it be aa loan like the rags did?

No, he will be ours.

 

[Haz]

He would be all ours. 3rd party ownership is now against PL rules.

 

[PaoloB]

He would be all ours. 3rd party ownership is now against PL rules.

so why aint the rags had poinst knocked off then

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

He would be all ours. 3rd party ownership is now against PL rules.

so why aint the rags had poinst knocked off then

special dispensation for the loan agreement they had

 

[Rammyblues]

Yes.

 

[sam221985]

they are looking for someone to buy his contract outright, no leasing like the rags did for 2 years.

basically whoever he signs for next, this is the end of Tevez's third-party ownership- I imagine he'd keep Kia Jaroobchian on as his agent/representative but no different from any other player in that respect.

 

[Daz_Blue]

He would be all ours. 3rd party ownership is now against PL rules.

so why aint the rags had poinst knocked off then

Because the Premier league would not dare punish the rags ........and it is not allowed ( didnt you read the Premier League rule book bylaw 666: Manchester United will never be punished no matter what they do) look it up ....

 

[Rammyblues]

Ha ha but I think it was all to do with laws not being retrospective.

 

[sam221985]

Reading the Rags forum (red cafe) it seems they are a lot more concerned about him going to Liverpool, seem relatively indifferent or even unphased about the prospect of him playing for us.

Perhaps it's just because they're all plastics, I dunno..

If he actually lines up for us against them and scores though I still reckon they be as sick as parrot! :)