mrbelfry
Well-Known Member
I do have a feelingAre you sure that’s not Marvin Gaye you have on.
I do have a feelingAre you sure that’s not Marvin Gaye you have on.
you can do far better than that.Och aye the noo.
Ooh don't think I heard that one!
I rated it quite high. They are a good band.Before my time but harshly dealt with I think. The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Bowie and a previous Archbishop of Canterbury would all disagree with the thread conclusion.
Oh I don’t know!you can do far better than that.
Anyway back to music.
After a few listens to this weeks pick I wanted something different than investigating their other albums.
I’ve had music on all evening. Various, including Hozier, Michael Kiwanuka and ultimately an expedition into Lloyd Cole since Rattlesnakes, which I always liked.
All I can say is I am mightily impressed.
I’m up to 1993 and the three or four albums I’ve had on were all different and all very very good.
How the hell did I let him pass me by from the 80’s up.
Just because it marked the nadir (apex to some) of drug-addled, self-indulgent hippiedom doesn't mean there wasn't something to learn from it. As a youth I learned a lot from PIL's "Metal Box", Einsturzende Neubaten and Throbbing Gristle's "Hamburger Lady" but they're all difficult listens. Swirly and/or confusing vs. harsh and/or grotesque.Before my time but harshly dealt with I think. The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Bowie and a previous Archbishop of Canterbury would all disagree with the thread conclusion.
Just because it marked the nadir (apex to some) of drug-addled, self-indulgent hippiedom doesn't mean there wasn't something to learn from it. As a youth I learned a lot from PIL's "Metal Box", Einsturzende Neubaten and Throbbing Gristle's "Hamburger Lady" but they're all difficult listens. Swirly and/or confusing vs. harsh and/or grotesque.