threespires
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 6,249
- Team supported
- City
I think I'm partly motivated out of jealousy. The appropriate headgear for my face is a bag - I'd love to be able to wear hats confidently.
The beauty of art is that it can withstand multiple interpretations. What is the truth? What the artists intended or what the audience perceived? My post took things to an absurd place I don't believe. my initial interpretation is the one I still hold to - it's 50 years out of date and lacks sincerity.
Yes I realised that. I have some sympathy with the 50 years out of date comment but as for the sincerity of the transmission who knows? You can definitely say by the time it hits your ears it lacks sincerity and you can often get a sense of the intent of the artist from both what they claim, what has gone before and the context in which they created it but can never be wholly sure. In this case it's complicated, Wonder, in his own detached superstar way, may well be entirely sincere in his writing whereas Clark may be somewhat cynical in taking up the offer. I still think it's more likely that Clark would simply leap at the chance to record with Wonder for the right reasons and that any misgivings about the material could be diluted by adopting B&Ws approach of it's a broad brush position on societal problems that still exists.
You are right, the whole question of intent and perception, transmission and reception in art is an integral part of its wonder. I also find it a great tool for self-reflection. Sometimes in the darkness of the night I conclude that my aggressively negative response to the art of Bon Jovi says much more about me than it does Mr Bongiovi; the Three Poetesses opined "If I'm ugly then so are you" it's a salutary message.