No, by all means keep commenting, that's ultimately what the thread is for, and it makes it all the more interesting. And we have previously gone on far more astray tangents (often involving radiohead ;)) than just about the artist at hand. Plus, always good to exchange opinion with someone that knows some background, as much people sharing impressions too. We may well have sat in the same room at some point listening to them live.
Yeah intersting take, maybe depends on at what point and in what context you may have seen them live. I do get it, and have at times questioned whether they were just propping the rod they made for their own backs.
I think initially, it was genuine, probably. In the sense that are three very capable and established musicians, who got together based on shared likes and circles, and just tried something for fun with no idea where it would go. They had live gigs long before they released an album, and at some of the early shows, all you could get was their individual albums. They hadn't yet recoreded anything, despite having a full enough set to perform. So you would feel guilty if you got one, while the other two looked at you in disappointment! In fact they used to email their small circle of 'subscribers' mp3s directly as they recorded them, prior to the first album. I still have a couple of yet unreleased songs. At one gig they suggested requests, I shouted one out, and they politely had to make an excuse that it was going back a bit too far.
So at that point, the 'look at me' I think was consequential to the nature of their band. Effectively three musicians 'jamming' for lack of a better word (washes mouth out). That's why some songs come across as bitty, because one brought their theme forward to start with and at some point the other morphed into a tune they wrote and knew, while the third tried to keep up. In fact when the first album came out, I remember being somewhat disappointed it didn't feel as organic as their live stuff and felt more 'planned'.
I think from there onwards though, it is hard to guess whether they continued with it because that's just how they liked making music, and it worked for them. OR, whether they had to live up to the 'breaking boundaries' acclaim that was attributed to them by the success of the early shows and the critics. What is probably beyond doubt is that they exhausted it, either way.
Some things they collaborate on can actually be even more extreme, as well as more structured, but that's another discussion for later. This iteration started out as them 'being themselves' and having a comfortable setting to try that in. At what point it lost that and became a milestone round their necks, hard to say. Imo, probably the album after this (excluding the inbetween EP).