We were bottom of the league when Allison / Book were sacked. Bond came in and we won immediately (Birmingham at home I think) and then Gow / Hutch and Bobby Mac came in and we get to the semi final of the League Cup (robbed of a place in the final by an appalling decision to disallow Reeves 'goal' at Maine Road and were 10 mins away from lifting the FA Cup, to be denied by a cruel own goal and we finished mid table.
The following season, with a fit Trevor Francis, we'd have gone far..... so yes.... as a manager of City he is certainly fondly remembered by me.
Yes - I agree with you. Those were my thoughts at the time too.
However - it can't be denied that :
a) Within 2.5 seasons of him taking over we were relegated with his team;
b) His dealings meant we had a small squad with a lot of aged players;
c) Bringing in the players he did (Boyer, Hareide, Francis, Hartford, K. Bond, Baker, Cross) broke the back of the parlous finances;
d) Hutch and Gow (who played such a big role in 80/81) were finished at City in not more than a year after joining (arguably losihg us several 100k).
So - simply in terms of outcomes - I do wonder (without suggesting an answer) if in the long run (and ignoring the sticking plasters of 1981) we might have been better sticking with Allison and his kids! At least it wouldn't have put the club further in debt. And they might have managed to stay up.
However - my question was more aimed at Bond as a person. He doesn't come across well at all for me in the City video and other ones. And I got the impression a lot of the City players (Reid/ Ranson etc) weren't keen on him - although that might have been to do with money.