mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Go where?I think the Monarchy, on balance, should probably go. I think it’s time.
But its power and potential for positive impact, with visits like today, is undeniable.
It’s just not enough anymore imo.
Go where?I think the Monarchy, on balance, should probably go. I think it’s time.
But its power and potential for positive impact, with visits like today, is undeniable.
It’s just not enough anymore imo.
Lose their status as Head of State. Cease to exist, through that prism.Go where?
Would you elect a head of state? Would your church and state be separated?Lose their status as Head of State. Cease to exist, through that prism.
Tax payers money pays for the upkeep of all the historic houses and the King is caretaker of what is ultimately the wealth of the nation.
You can go and visit most of the castles, houses even Buckingham Palace if you want to pretend you live there, they are open to the public.
We pay them to meet and greet the public on our behalf certainly plenty of people delighted to see the King in Southport
Would you elect a head of state? Would your church and state be separated?
What would happen to their state assets? Properties etc.
Australia had a referendum on becoming a republic a few years ago. Despite a decent majority in favour of the idea, they voted it down. Why? Because the politicians buggered it up by reserving the right to elect the president to themselves in parliament and not elected directly by the people.I'm no republican, but it's clear the case for having a royal family is diminishing over time and I imagine all those problems are solvable. I am more worried that such a significant constitutional change would be fucked up by "politicians". If we have learned anything in the last decade it must be that structural changes must have overwhelming support and be properly thought through. I have zero confidence in the British political class to see that through. I am much more confident that keeping the royal family will cause much less chaos, tbh.
Australia had a referendum on becoming a republic a few years ago. Despite a decent majority in favour of the idea, they voted it down. Why? Because the politicians buggered it up by reserving the right to elect the president to themselves in parliament and not elected directly by the people.
Well no, there are always multiple reasons but most commentators put the election method as the most common one for switching from yes to no.That was the only reason?