blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Fingers crossed.Hope they have it underwritten - the way its going an offer like that could bankrupt most papers these days.
Fingers crossed.Hope they have it underwritten - the way its going an offer like that could bankrupt most papers these days.
The reason they're not doing it is because, according to a No 10 spokesman, It's against tory principles.Fair points. I’d not pay a blind bit of attention to what Johnson and co give as their reasons for not doing so, I’d also not be surprised to see them u-turn on this either as they seem to lack the words of their convictions. Or maybe just lack any convictions… oh wait nope they got a few convictions recently
What we really need is no private utility companies for life's essentials.
They could reduce the profit margin on the energy they sell. It's not costing them any more to produce it.Nor are Italy and Spain renowned for their oil/gas production. Is there a major producing nation that has introduced a windfall tax.l?
The energy crisis hit long before Russia invade Ukraine they were a result of exiting lockdowns - particularly in Asia. In 2020 oil was actually trading at a negative price - unbelievably they would pay you to take the oil. Shell (as an example) lost $21bn in 2020, BP lost a touch over $20bn. In fact I’d suspect if you averaged out profits 2020-2022 they’ll not be far off 2016-2019. So they aren’t really making excess profits in that sense - although this is an exceptional start to the year and we have a long way to go yet. For reference the oil “war premium” is priced in around $20 a barrel.
Your wider question to what makes excess profits ok for one different to excess profits for another. It’s a fair question. It boils down to a question of fairness, shell/bp/total have been in the oil/gas game for years - through the highs and lows - for PPE we had companies making millions who had never touched PPE previously. They were opportunists, and can have little complaint being hit with an opportunist tax - which is exactly what a windfall tax is. Tax should always have a sense of fairness at its core, although that’s not always the case (eg tax on tampons).
If a fair case can be made to tax these companies more then I’m all ears. But just saying well they’ve earned a tonne of cash in Q1 2022 and we want a part isn’t really a fair case. It may be a worthy cause but there are many worthy causes out there - and these companies are free to make huge donations and create a hardship fund or whatever they want to call it should they so wish (which I would do if I was CEO of one of these btw)
Rather, it's remarkable how inherently honest people can vote for this corrupt government.Really quite depressing just how inherently corrupt our country has become under this government.
Nor are Italy and Spain renowned for their oil/gas production. Is there a major producing nation that has introduced a windfall tax.l?
The energy crisis hit long before Russia invade Ukraine they were a result of exiting lockdowns - particularly in Asia. In 2020 oil was actually trading at a negative price - unbelievably they would pay you to take the oil. Shell (as an example) lost $21bn in 2020, BP lost a touch over $20bn. In fact I’d suspect if you averaged out profits 2020-2022 they’ll not be far off 2016-2019. So they aren’t really making excess profits in that sense - although this is an exceptional start to the year and we have a long way to go yet. For reference the oil “war premium” is priced in around $20 a barrel.
Your wider question to what makes excess profits ok for one different to excess profits for another. It’s a fair question. It boils down to a question of fairness, shell/bp/total have been in the oil/gas game for years - through the highs and lows - for PPE we had companies making millions who had never touched PPE previously. They were opportunists, and can have little complaint being hit with an opportunist tax - which is exactly what a windfall tax is. Tax should always have a sense of fairness at its core, although that’s not always the case (eg tax on tampons).
If a fair case can be made to tax these companies more then I’m all ears. But just saying well they’ve earned a tonne of cash in Q1 2022 and we want a part isn’t really a fair case. It may be a worthy cause but there are many worthy causes out there - and these companies are free to make huge donations and create a hardship fund or whatever they want to call it should they so wish (which I would do if I was CEO of one of these btw)
People get the government they deserve. Majority of people might be honest but there are a lot of corrupt people about happy enough to vote for corrupt people for personal gain.Rather, it's remarkable how inherently honest people can vote for this corrupt government.
Inherently honest people may vote for this corrupt government if they are not suffering personally. It's more remarkable that some voters who are suffering from Tory policies will continue to vote for them.Rather, it's remarkable how inherently honest people can vote for this corrupt government.
I rather think that some people are voting for them in the same way some people follow football teams; they want to be on the side that's winning. They want to say I voted Tory because Labour never win. They don't have a clue about the consequences of their actions because they know nothing about politics or how it works.Inherently honest people may vote for this corrupt government if they are not suffering personally. It's more remarkable that some voters who are suffering from Tory policies will continue to vote for them.