johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,566
No!Seriously?
No!Seriously?
What would it take for Charlie boy to intervene as, surely this proposed change to legislation must be raising his eyebrows somewhat. After all, it is his Government
The fact that Charlie boy read out King Rishi's speech without saying "This is all bollocks" shows the monarchy is only useful for pageantry and fucking idiots who don't feel embarrassed that they are "subjects" of another person.The moment the crown gets involved in parliamentary affairs is likely the moment we’ll become a republic.
I don’t think he’d get involved even if Sunak were loading refugees into ovens.
When you put this turn of events beside this govt‘s desire to leave the ECHR, it makes a very sinister and worrying picture.I’m not in any way doubting the correctness of this but it just seems totally crazy.
What is the point in any judicial check and balance if the government can just pass legislation to assert a set of facts to be true that allows them to win their case?
You might as well not have courts reviewing legislation at all. Again it seems like another part of our system that is held up on the principle that people behave with integrity but there’s no actual safety net if they behave otherwise.
Whatever the case, to have a unanimous panel of supreme court judges and the UNHRC state Rwanda is not a safe country for refugees and then have 350 MPs in parliament assert by vote that it is is so Orwellian that it boggles my mind.
What “facts” will they legislate for next? That Rishi Sunak is our eternal super emperor?
Jeremy **** leaking to his client journalists he's "looking" at cutting Income Tax and national insurance.
Must be an election coming up...
Not to this extentIn the 80s I never met a Tory voter. They won 4 elections in row by big majorities. Never trust the polls because people lie.