bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
they are wicked and have shit for brains but they aren't dumb enough to bite the hand that feeds them.
The Conservative Party
- Thread starter dave_blue12
- Start date
they are wicked and have shit for brains but they aren't dumb enough to bite the hand that feeds them.
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,902
I would suspect that that quite a few of these Russians know where a lot of bodies are buried (literally in some cases) and have beans to spill which would show just how much collusion there was in both brexit and the lying fraud’s election victory.
No, and they have no intention of releasing it.
I can't remember the name of the man who ran it now, but millions of pounds were illegally provided to the leave campaign through Cambridge Analytica, funded with Russian money.
They blitzed advertising on social media in the two weeks before the referendum, which had the desired affect as far as their backers were concerned. It was the only time the leave campaign was ahead in the polls.
Their desire to keep the proposed EU banking laws away from the secrets of their money laundering was a success, and the tory party has directly received millions in donations from their grateful associates as a result.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Uber ****
www.cityam.com
www.cityam.com
Jacob Rees-Mogg says little evidence Brexit hit trade
The Brexit benefits minister says Covid is behind trade falls, and Brexit is helping the economy.
www.bbc.co.uk
Brexit shaves off record £20bn from UK exports in one year alone with imports from EU also dropping - CityAM
UK exports to EU countries shrunk by a record £20bn in just 20 months, according to new figures. Sales to the EU dropped more significantly in 2021 than exports to any other country in the world, the ONS data shows, as UK to EU exports nosedived 12 per cent between January and December of last [...]
www.cityam.com
Conflict of interest claims: While looking for Brexit opportunities, Jacob Rees-Mogg holds stake in $8bn emerging market investment fund - CityAM
Experts have pointed out that Jacob Rees-Mogg holds a substantial stake in a multi-billion investment fund specialised in emerging markets, while at the same time he is now tasked with finding ‘Brexit opportunities’ in those same countries. Rees-Mogg is a major shareholder in Somerset Capital...
www.cityam.com
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Do you mean this report, they released in 2020, that they have no intention of ever releasing?
Lardy_Blue
Active Member
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 31
- Team supported
- Manchester City
It's not a proper report as stated
"The matters covered by our Inquiry are highly sensitive. We have been told, repeatedly, that the Russian Intelligence Services will analyse whatever we put in the public domain and therefore, on this subject more than any other, the potential to damage the capabilities of the intelligence and security Agencies and Defence Intelligence was both real and significant. It was clear, therefore, that any Report would have to be subjected to extensive redaction, and risked becoming unreadable. In order to be able to publish a Report at all, we have accordingly decided to produce a shorter Report than usual, which takes the form of a summary of the most important points we have noted during the Inquiry, at a high level, without revealing underlying detail. We have supplemented this with a substantial Annex, which provides both greater detail on the points we have raised and further rationale for the judgements we have reached. This Annex is not published at this time, in view of the current Russian threat."
Also
"47. We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference, ***.53 This situation is in stark contrast to the US handling of allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, where an intelligence community assessment54 was produced within two months of the vote, with an unclassified summary being made public. Whilst the issues at stake in the EU referendum campaign are less clearcut, it is nonetheless the Committee’s view that the UK Intelligence Community should produce an analogous assessment of potential Russian interference in the EU referendum and that an unclassified summary of it be published.55"
Shows there was a distinct lack of any attempt to look into this by the government, wonder why.
Also
"The Government recognises that the increase in demand for intelligence to support the campaign against terrorism has meant that the Agencies, amongst others, have been obliged to review their priorities within their own budgets. This process has been carried out professionally and carefully, and the Government will continue to keep the situation under review. It is inevitable that if some areas of activity become relatively more important to the national interest, others become relatively less so and may have less resources devoted to them. All decisions about matching resources to tasks involve a degree of risk. Identifying, quantifying, managing, and where possible mitigating those risks is one of the basic responsibilities of the management of the Agencies. The Government is confident that the judgements taken so far have been the right ones, and that no unacceptable risks with or to national security have been, or will be taken.67"
Reduce budget to investigate in case you find something incriminating
"The matters covered by our Inquiry are highly sensitive. We have been told, repeatedly, that the Russian Intelligence Services will analyse whatever we put in the public domain and therefore, on this subject more than any other, the potential to damage the capabilities of the intelligence and security Agencies and Defence Intelligence was both real and significant. It was clear, therefore, that any Report would have to be subjected to extensive redaction, and risked becoming unreadable. In order to be able to publish a Report at all, we have accordingly decided to produce a shorter Report than usual, which takes the form of a summary of the most important points we have noted during the Inquiry, at a high level, without revealing underlying detail. We have supplemented this with a substantial Annex, which provides both greater detail on the points we have raised and further rationale for the judgements we have reached. This Annex is not published at this time, in view of the current Russian threat."
Also
"47. We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference, ***.53 This situation is in stark contrast to the US handling of allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, where an intelligence community assessment54 was produced within two months of the vote, with an unclassified summary being made public. Whilst the issues at stake in the EU referendum campaign are less clearcut, it is nonetheless the Committee’s view that the UK Intelligence Community should produce an analogous assessment of potential Russian interference in the EU referendum and that an unclassified summary of it be published.55"
Shows there was a distinct lack of any attempt to look into this by the government, wonder why.
Also
"The Government recognises that the increase in demand for intelligence to support the campaign against terrorism has meant that the Agencies, amongst others, have been obliged to review their priorities within their own budgets. This process has been carried out professionally and carefully, and the Government will continue to keep the situation under review. It is inevitable that if some areas of activity become relatively more important to the national interest, others become relatively less so and may have less resources devoted to them. All decisions about matching resources to tasks involve a degree of risk. Identifying, quantifying, managing, and where possible mitigating those risks is one of the basic responsibilities of the management of the Agencies. The Government is confident that the judgements taken so far have been the right ones, and that no unacceptable risks with or to national security have been, or will be taken.67"
Reduce budget to investigate in case you find something incriminating
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Band of Wankers
www.theguardian.com
The evidence is all around us: life outside the single market is an utter disaster | Simon Jenkins
An island nation must trade with its nearest mainland, whatever our new Brexit opportunities minister claims, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins
www.theguardian.com
roypaulknewmyfather
Well-Known Member
100% the case. The only opportunity Rees-Smug will find is one for himself and his hedge fund buddies. The rest of us can struggle!Band of Wankers
The evidence is all around us: life outside the single market is an utter disaster | Simon Jenkins
An island nation must trade with its nearest mainland, whatever our new Brexit opportunities minister claims, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins
Fred_Quimby
Well-Known Member
It has been nearly a week now since Reese-smug asked Sun and Express readers to write in about Brexit benefits. When are we getting the grand exposé?? Sunday??