BusterPhillips
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2009
- Messages
- 3,033
Pellegrini has had success at all of the clubs he's been at playing his high risk and high reward 4-2-2-2.
There was a point in season 1 and 2 whereby lots of us and the press were calling for Pellers to play a traditional 4-2-3-1 formation, however this formation never got the best out of Augero and didn't really shore up the defence like we thought it would.
Whenever we played 4-2-2-2 we usually outscored the opposition, when we play 4-2-3-1 we look like we lack urgency, over compensate in throwing people forward and ultimately get picked off (all of the top six played us like mugs doing this).
I will always have a soft spot for Pellers, not quite to the level of Mancini though - but anyway I think Pellers should have stuck to his guns and played 4-2-2-2.
There was a point in season 1 and 2 whereby lots of us and the press were calling for Pellers to play a traditional 4-2-3-1 formation, however this formation never got the best out of Augero and didn't really shore up the defence like we thought it would.
Whenever we played 4-2-2-2 we usually outscored the opposition, when we play 4-2-3-1 we look like we lack urgency, over compensate in throwing people forward and ultimately get picked off (all of the top six played us like mugs doing this).
I will always have a soft spot for Pellers, not quite to the level of Mancini though - but anyway I think Pellers should have stuck to his guns and played 4-2-2-2.
Last edited: