The Etihad Stadium

CheethamHillBlue

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 Apr 2009
Messages
1,506
Location
Manchester
IF the owners decided they wanted to buy the stadium in the near future, especially with the 60,000 seats comments, would it be -
a) Possible?
b) A way around FFPR?
 
I think the deal they re-negotiated with MCC is better for the Community/MCC and City for the forseeable future.

if the club bought it, my understanding is Sport England would take a huge chunk of that money.
 
CheethamHillBlue said:
IF the owners decided they wanted to buy the stadium in the near future, especially with the 60,000 seats comments, would it be -
a) Possible?
b) A way around FFPR?

How would it possibly be a way around FFPR?

Aside from that there is no way it could be used as a way around FFPR, please, please, will people stop thinking that the way to beat FFPR is to find loopholes. I'm getting so sick of this.
 
CheethamHillBlue said:
IF the owners decided they wanted to buy the stadium in the near future, especially with the 60,000 seats comments, would it be -
a) Possible?
b) A way around FFPR?
Any thing we spend be it our stadium or not its a good thing
Keep spending chuck the money at every thing and watch it grow we're never gonna sell it Evan if we did buy it .
 
Falastur said:
CheethamHillBlue said:
IF the owners decided they wanted to buy the stadium in the near future, especially with the 60,000 seats comments, would it be -
a) Possible?
b) A way around FFPR?

How would it possibly be a way around FFPR?

Aside from that there is no way it could be used as a way around FFPR, please, please, will people stop thinking that the way to beat FFPR is to find loopholes. I'm getting so sick of this.

If you had taken your head out of your arse and read the bit where i asked a question instead of chucking your toys out of the pram with the 'I'm getting so sick of this' bollocks, you would see i don't know if or how it could affect spending. That's why i asked.
Pardon me for asking a question that you didn't like. FFS
 
CheethamHillBlue said:
Falastur said:
CheethamHillBlue said:
IF the owners decided they wanted to buy the stadium in the near future, especially with the 60,000 seats comments, would it be -
a) Possible?
b) A way around FFPR?

How would it possibly be a way around FFPR?

Aside from that there is no way it could be used as a way around FFPR, please, please, will people stop thinking that the way to beat FFPR is to find loopholes. I'm getting so sick of this.

If you had taken your head out of your arse and read the bit where i asked a question instead of chucking your toys out of the pram with the 'I'm getting so sick of this' bollocks, you would see i don't know if or how it could affect spending. That's why i asked.
Pardon me for asking a question that you didn't like. FFS

Sorry, I have a bad tendency to overreact on forums. My fault entirely. I do wish that people would just accept that City are determined to play FFPR straight and not find a way of cheating it, though.
 
Falastur said:
Sorry, I have a bad tendency to overreact on forums. My fault entirely. I do wish that people would just accept that City are determined to play FFPR straight and not find a way of cheating it, though.

Cheers for that. I've no doubt the owners will want to comply too.
 
The council cant/wont sell it, the new deal we got was a result of our owners threatening to just build a new stadium where the academy is going.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.