Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,343
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/dec/23/roberto-mancini-robinho-manchester-icty" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... ester-icty</a>
I suppose they could of course had someone climbing up the fence too, but i doubt it. It's far more likely they just stole it off bluemoon. As much as i enjoy and appreciate the training reports, is it better we don't have them? I'm not sure what the answer is to be honest, just throwing the question out there. In this instance, we are short of centre backs, so i'm sure Tony Pulis could have worked out for himself that it was going to be Toure and Kompany playing together, but perhaps we shouldn't be confirming information such as this, allowing it to get into the papers and then inform our opposition? I guess the compromise is keep the training reports, but alter the content of them, so they are far less revealing in future?
I suppose they could of course had someone climbing up the fence too, but i doubt it. It's far more likely they just stole it off bluemoon. As much as i enjoy and appreciate the training reports, is it better we don't have them? I'm not sure what the answer is to be honest, just throwing the question out there. In this instance, we are short of centre backs, so i'm sure Tony Pulis could have worked out for himself that it was going to be Toure and Kompany playing together, but perhaps we shouldn't be confirming information such as this, allowing it to get into the papers and then inform our opposition? I guess the compromise is keep the training reports, but alter the content of them, so they are far less revealing in future?