The Harry and Meghan fuss

Brewster's millions said:
So everyone on here has been getting their knickers in a twist based on false information?

On the Bluemoon Harry and Meghan thread? Surely not!
Click to expand...

Posts claiming Camilla was partying with Clarkson/Moron misrepresent the event, and it shouldn't be held against Camilla that she was there.
That is all that it means, and it's a minor issue.

The Clarkson piece is reprehensible and without any obvious provocation. It's just plain nasty, and the entire Sun hierarchy allowed it to be published which just shows that they've not changed either.
 
MillionMilesAway said:
Posts claiming Camilla was partying with Clarkson/Moron misrepresent the event, and it shouldn't be held against Camilla that she was there.
That is all that it means, and it's a minor issue.

The Clarkson piece is reprehensible and without any obvious provocation. It's just plain nasty, and the entire Sun hierarchy allowed it to be published which just shows that they've not changed either.
Click to expand...
Brewster’s Web knows what he’s doing…
 
MillionMilesAway said:
The Clarkson piece is reprehensible and without any obvious provocation. It's just plain nasty, and the entire Sun hierarchy allowed it to be published which just shows that they've not changed either.
Click to expand...

they've allowed these types of comments and hatred to be published for many years - they must be surprised on the backlash to this one
 
BlueHammer85 said:
they've allowed these types of comments and hatred to be published for many years - they must be surprised on the backlash to this one
Click to expand...

Presumably so, I don't recall hearing of anything quite as awful as this one.

The thing is I don't know what IPSO (or whoever the complaints people are) can do - the Sun will say it's a comment piece and doesn't advocate harm directly (although it is obviously just another piece which inflames and will encourage if unchecked).
 
MillionMilesAway said:
Presumably so, I don't recall hearing of anything quite as awful as this one.

The thing is I don't know what IPSO (or whoever the complaints people are) can do - the Sun will say it's a comment piece and doesn't advocate harm directly (although it is obviously just another piece which inflames and will encourage if unchecked).
Click to expand...

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

The List Of People Attacking Katie Hopkins Over This Article Is Truly Impressive

The List Of People Attacking Katie Hopkins Over This Article Is Truly Impressive
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk www.huffingtonpost.co.uk
 
MillionMilesAway said:
We might not, couldn't say for sure obviously.
However, it's easy to be wise with hindsight.

The Palace very rarely comment on media pieces, and breaking that would be s significant move. My expectation is that the same things would be presented in a sneakier way. I'm not sure what the Palace are meant to be able to do - withdraw access, and be even more of a target (if Harry/Meghan are anything to go by).
Click to expand...
The way I see it is that Royal Family is big news and sells newspapers. A timely statement from the Palace along the lines of stating that constructive criticism is fine but articles with sinister undertones are an entirely different thing would've seen most - or all - of the venomous bile end overnight. It would also perhaps have helped heal any rifts between Harry and other family members so it would've been a win-win in that regard.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
the troll on here is saying - it wasn't Camilla that hosted the event

regardless, they still all wined and dined and had a jolly up together whilst that abusive shite was being published
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was being facetious Mark - I knew exactly what he was saying ;) For me, the Camilla angle is the side issue - the main issue is Clarkson's piece.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.