tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Spare me!
Exactly. He’s been a target all along. This doesn’t really change anything. And for the likes of the Daily Heil to pontificate that he shouldn’t be talking about his time in Afghanistan is hypocritical in the extreme:What did the Taliban think that an Apache gunner did in Afghanistan before Harry mentioned it?
All these establishment figures now saying he shouldn’t mention it need to remember the WW2 fighter aces who recorded their kills on the sides of their Spitfires and Hurricanes.
War is a dirty business and its participants have not kept quiet about their kills in the past but because it’s Harry then all of a sudden it’s wrong.
He was already a target because of his participation which is why he feels he needs security which was one of the reasons he said he went to the US because it was being withdrawn here.
Killing the Taliban, what a traitor!
Is this boasting? Was he boasting in 2013 when he spoke about it too?Fcuk the Taliban. Where Harry’s got it completely wrong is in exposing his family to danger with the public boast.
I assume he’s never heard of Salman Rushdie or Charlie Hebdo.
The guy’s naive and, as mentioned above, needs to take better advice.
He’s at serious risk of achieving the opposite of what he intends.
William seems like a future king you would not care if he was given the charles 1st treatment, comes across a dislikable personHe says it's a lie that he was Williams best man but he just went along with it .
The Spare Prick At a Wedding
Maybe if one of the roses was ginger and the other had no petals.Funniest load of bollocks on this I have heard today was some royal historian on the beeb comparing this brotherly bit of handbags to the war of the roses, fucking idots