Bingo!Whatever the rights and wrongs of this I know one thing---- if he was in MY family I wouldn't be sharing any private information with him any time soon. OR trusting my private life to be kept just that.
She turned up last summer, has she been racially abused since last summer , what's changed??She doesn't want to spend time in the company of those she considers racist.
People have the right to their choice of publicity - I don't understand what is difficult to grasp about that, but I absolutely know that the media not chosen will be raging about it.
Haters are still tempted to hate, and seek every reason to justify that hate - it is BIG business.
It's not just the haters, the lovers are even bigger business - they buy the books and watch the documentaries.She doesn't want to spend time in the company of those she considers racist.
People have the right to their choice of publicity - I don't understand what is difficult to grasp about that, but I absolutely know that the media not chosen will be raging about it.
Haters are still tempted to hate, and seek every reason to justify that hate - it is BIG business.
If she’d have accepted the invitation you’d have accused her of only doing it to steal the limelight. She can’t win with people like you.If he wanted a discrete private life he should stay out of the limelight. Making money out of selling stories about your private life is a very strange thing to do in these circumstances.
I see Meghan declined an invitation to the coronation, I wonder what she had on that was more important?
I fully expect another Ophra interview or similar in the next year where she will reveal her innermost thoughts and reasons for not attending. Got to keep the paying public on tenter hooks when your living is selling your private life.
Not at all. I have never criticised her for things like that, stop making stuff up to suit your narrative.If she’d have accepted the invitation you’d have accused her of only doing it to steal the limelight. She can’t win with people like you.
You’ve spent the last few pages accusing them of popping up for media attention any chance they get. Why would you think differently about this event which will have more media scrutiny than any other?Not at all. I have never criticised her for things like that, stop making stuff up to suit your narrative.
Why don't you try debating the point and offer a reason for her non attendance, rather than just attacking the poster?You’ve spent the last few pages accusing them of popping up for media attention any chance they get. Why would you think differently about this event which will have more media scrutiny than any other?
Fair enough, can't dissagree with much is any of that. I'm no fan of Murdoch.The reason Harry submitted papers to court which included the William case is because the Sun are trying to avoid the consequences by saying he is "timed out" of action. They want to avoid more public scrutiny in a court of law. Harry's point is that any delay is because the agreement with William was done in secret so he can only follow up when he became aware of that dodgy deal. The wider exposure over the last 48 hours is purely the press going for income via click bait.
I doubt any award Harry will get would be something that would change his life but the forces on the other side are the one's who lose out. With a Harry win a very aged Rupert Murdoch sees his empire further slurred and outed for the scummy filth that it is and he faces disgrace then death. Meanwhile all those self appointed Royal experts and writers see a revenue stream under threat. In both cases I know where my loyalties lie - I want Murdoch broken and his press empire smashed and if collateral damage takes all those "Royal Insiders" with it then frankly thats a win win