The Labour Government

First the WFA u-turn and now the abandonment of the planned welfare cuts - all without a suggestion of how they plan to pay for it.

Straight out of the Liz Truss playbook.

Utterly shambolic.

Reeves and co busy inventing yet another financial black hole of their own making as well don’t forget.

I wonder if she and many in here will mention it?
 
I know this for absolute certainty.

Had this been a Tory bill not one of them would have supported it, not one!

Fair play to you and a few others who still have their dignity and principles intact.


I'm pretty sure that I disagree with you on a lot of topics, but I appreciate it. I'll probably be banned from this thread soon anyway. Let the circle jerk ensue.
 
B
The amendment failed and the Bill will pass, but the damage has been done according to mainstream media.
Cheers. Well, that’s what democracy’s for.

Personally, I’d like to see massive reform of all areas of welfare/benefits and give those that need it a decent standard of living, including supply of social housing and social infrastructure.

I suppose this is part of what they are trying to, save money to invest elsewhere. How they thought Labour MPs would go along with this, I’m not sure.
 
Yes, it is interesting. So lots of concessions made and no savings made. Which of your taxes are you prepared to see rise to pay, what is on the way, to becoming an unsustainable welfare budget?

You can flip that, is there any group you aren't willing to throw under a bus for Starmers endless pursuit of strong and stable ie look I'm dead sensible me not like those old timer socialists.
 
I'm giving credit to the rebels and if I'm being honest i don't know much about them individually or the rest of the party who cowardly toe the party line. Having differing views is vital. You could never get 10 people to agree on everything so when you see blocs of MPs who do it they are of no use to anybody. May as well throw them in a bin.

Well before last election I came to the conclusion the cast was set however which way I voted.

If I'm wrong correct me, but there was a record low voter turn-out and thus a record low mandate for Labour?

Like Hungary have had a state referendum on the vote to allowing Ukraine into EU - further mandate should be sent back down the pyramid.

Power is currently at the top in unelected orifices, and it's utterly pointless and a waste of a vote locally.
 
B

Cheers. Well, that’s what democracy’s for.

Personally, I’d like to see massive reform of all areas of welfare/benefits and give those that need it a decent standard of living, including supply of social housing and social infrastructure.

I suppose this is part of what they are trying to, save money to invest elsewhere. How they thought Labour MPs would go along with this, I’m not sure.
There are so many Labour MPs it brings different problems. By their sheer number it means many will never aspire to more senior positions. So they vote according to what their constituents will want.
Which is a good thing.
 
Well before last election I came to the conclusion the cast was set however which way I voted.

If I'm wrong correct me, but there was a record low voter turn-out and thus a record low mandate for Labour?

Like Hungary have had a state referendum on the vote to allowing Ukraine into EU - further mandate should be sent back down the pyramid.

Power is currently at the top in unelected orifices, and it's utterly pointless and a waste of a vote locally.


Some interesting facts here including lowest turnout was in Rusholme at a paltry 40%. Never knew that.

*Edit

Just noticed high turnout wealthy area
Low turnout poor area, apathy or despondency?
 
I didn’t vote for them but I really wanted Labour to do well, not just because I want (and hope most still do) any government to succeed but also the alternative that it would lead to if they didn’t still doesn’t bear thinking about to me. I’ve also tried to give a lot of leeway with them being out of power for so long and expected them to make a few mistakes.

The amount of self inflicted wounds are starting to pile up though. Not sure exactly where needs the change but they need to work out where and do it quickly.
 



200h.gif
 
People get put off by how decisive politics is - to the point of ignoring it all and ultimately not engaging in the democratic process. Up until the day of voting I sold myself I'll not vote, as I no longer had faith in the democratic process I was partaking in. I ended up voting, as I always thought millions died for that chance - sounds cliche.

People didn't turn out to vote because they've lost trust in all fronts of our leadership.
 
Reeves and co busy inventing yet another financial black hole of their own making as well don’t forget.

I wonder if she and many in here will mention it?
They’re in disarray.

They come up with some cack-handed welfare ‘reforms’ because Rachel already needs snookers for her sums to add up, and they make such a balls up of it that they’ll never be able to do anything on welfare ever again.

Now they’ll need to raise a ton of tax in October and it’s going to be a complete free for all across the party with everyone piping up on which taxes they want hiked. So they’ll be gunning for Reeves and although Starmer should really just get rid he can’t because that would leave him too exposed. And all within 12 months of getting elected!
 
You can flip that, is there any group you aren't willing to throw under a bus for Starmers endless pursuit of strong and stable ie look I'm dead sensible me not like those old timer socialists.
Sorry, no, it's what you do all of the time. The Tories let the roof fall in and it now needs repairing. Answer which taxes you are happy to see rise and, potentially pay yourself.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top