The Labour Government

75 majority, hardly very very tight. Clueless once again and you’re getting all giddy about this knowing full well you’d love nothing more than Farage in power to go much further than this against people out of work and those claiming disability payments.

75 majority in a Bill that they had to continually u-turn on right up to the last minute.

Without that they lose. 49 of his MPs voted against. They’re 1 year in and they are in complete disarray policy wise.

“Farage….reform……right wing media….black hole……train drivers”

Pensioners, the disabled, those on welfare!

This is supposedly a Labour government. Thank fuck for those who still remember that as Starmer and Reeves have forgot.
 
75 majority in a Bill that they had to continually u-turn on right up to the last minute.

Without that they lose. 49 of his MPs voted against. They’re 1 year in and they are in complete disarray policy wise.

“Farage….reform……right wing media….black hole……train drivers”

Pensioners, the disabled, those on welfare!

This is supposedly a Labour government. Thank fuck for those who still remember that as Starmer and Reeves have forgot.

Looks like they only have borrowing and tax increases left and according to some borrowing is not really an option.
 
Can you provide your source as well as figures for the people you claim are leaving the UK, given that it's a lot harder to stay anywhere in Europe for long now thanks to Brexit?
There's multiple sources. According to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025, the UK is expected to lose 16,500 millionaires in 2025, which is more than any other country in the world and more than double the number projected to leave China, which is second on the list with 7,800. This marks the first time in a decade of tracking that the UK has overtaken China as the top country for millionaire outflows. The report defines millionaires as individuals with over $1 million (about £740,500) in liquid, investable assets.





 
We met a someone on holiday who worked for a private company arranging accommodation for needy people in Sefton such as ex cons and drug addicts. They said they hoped PIP was abolished in the case of drug addicts as they immediately spent it on drugs. I was amazed that they got PIP but was assured that was the case. That sounds crazy to me.
 
We have been told taxes won’t need to go up.

She hasn’t lied about that has she?
It's about reality not lying. We want good public services, a good state pension, a good NHS, welfare benefits for those that are less able to work and the disabled. Now how is it all to be paid for, or which of the above are you prepared to reform ?
 
Each and every single one of his posts is always uninformed bullshit. He is so brainwashed it is unbelievable. As I previously posted - if Starmer said today was Christmas day he'd be there championing the announcement.
Or if it were you being criticised you would insist it was a valid opinion!!

Anyway in which areas of taxation are you prepared to pay a bit more? It's omly a few weeks ago you were moaning about higher council tax for your "very nice house", much of which goes on social care.
 
It's about reality not lying. We want good public services, a good state pension, a good NHS, welfare benefits for those that are less able to work and the disabled. Now how is it all to be paid for, or which of the above are you prepared to reform ?

All of it.

Back on topic, Labour said no tax rises so they and Reeves will have done yet another policy u-turn and lied yes if they introduce as expected?

It’s a very simple yes or no.
 
75 majority, hardly very very tight. Clueless once again and you’re getting all giddy about this knowing full well you’d love nothing more than Farage in power to go much further than this against people out of work and those claiming disability payments.

I believe Johnson suffered almost a dozen defeats on votes in Parliament yet the press are displaying their bias again by having a Beano claiming this win by 75 votes is a disaster for Starmer. Its as clear as day what the agenda is.
 
Just not true mate I'm afraid. The top 1% of tax earners contribute a hugely disproportionate amount to the overall tax receipts and when even 1 of them clears off, it leaves an enormous hole.

It's late and I don't have the article to hand but I read somewhere about the number of extra normal jobs that have to be created to make up for just 1 of these people leaving and it was a shockingly large number. An unrealistic number.

Wishing - or even accepting - that the very rich may clear off is a terrible strategy.

That’s just further proof of the problem though!

Most millionaires are hugely immobile, which is why when there were all the reports about the mass exodus leaving the UK, the media missed out that it equated to 0.3% of the millionaire population, which is the same percentage emigrating as any other group and in line with long term trends. The authors of the report you quote in a subsequent post (Henley) have backtracked on how they reported it recently.

None of that detracts from my main sentiment about the distribution of wealth though.
 
All of it.

Back on topic, Labour said no tax rises so they and Reeves will have done yet another policy u-turn and lied yes if they introduce as expected?

It’s a very simple yes or no.
It's all very much on topic. You want it all without any idea how to pay for it. If Labour had even suggested that personal tax rises may be on the cards the RW press would have had a field day and we would have been lumbered with another 5 years of the last lot. If you remember, one of the reasons Sunak went for an early GE was that it was becoming evident that taxes would have to rise late last year.

It was a mistake however to rule out increases in the likes of VAT for a full term.
 
I believe Johnson suffered almost a dozen defeats on votes in Parliament yet the press are displaying their bias again by having a Beano claiming this win by 75 votes is a disaster for Starmer. Its as clear as day what the agenda is.

they're making out its the first time ever in the history of politics a government has had some backbench rebellion.
 
Between the winter fuel allowance and now this ISA change I think they've left the door wide open for Reform to win the next General Election.

Should've kicked the can along a bit and at least got another term before upsetting everyone...
 
Thing that gets me is I am fine - retired at 60 on a works pension - never had any benefits ever but in the last 4 years I have had a few health issues that come with age (and some lifestyle choices if I am honest) so events like this make me think and explore more into the consequences ahead for me. I am a Labour supporter but some of the politics in the last year have been blind to my values - there are other targets that can produce the revenue the Govt wants. My concern is that if something happened tonight and as a result I qualified for PiP etc I should be ok. If the same thing happens in 5 or 10 years time not so - and thats just down to dates not needs which has to be wrong. The last 15 years have seen the money trickle UP not down - to paraphrase 30p Lee - " I want our money back"
If you want to qualify for PIP, you need to do so before state retirement age.

After that magic date you will not get a single penny in PIP no matter what your issues, unless you qualified prior to retirement. All you will be eligible for is the much lower Attendance Allowance.

So your 10 years in the future bit is moot, at least for you.
 
There's multiple sources. According to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025, the UK is expected to lose 16,500 millionaires in 2025, which is more than any other country in the world and more than double the number projected to leave China, which is second on the list with 7,800. This marks the first time in a decade of tracking that the UK has overtaken China as the top country for millionaire outflows. The report defines millionaires as individuals with over $1 million (about £740,500) in liquid, investable assets.





Can you provide any that aren’t in the future tense?
 
There's multiple sources. According to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025, the UK is expected to lose 16,500 millionaires in 2025, which is more than any other country in the world and more than double the number projected to leave China, which is second on the list with 7,800. This marks the first time in a decade of tracking that the UK has overtaken China as the top country for millionaire outflows. The report defines millionaires as individuals with over $1 million (about £740,500) in liquid, investable assets.





So a millionaire is anyone with liquid assets of £750,000? I'm halfway to that if I sold my house...

And most of them are not British but "citizens of nowhere" with no loyalty or commitment to the UK, whose presence here has pulled house prices up especially in London, probably doing more damage to everyone else's standard of living (especially young people) than any good from their discretionary spending while here.

I really have no way of testing the "millionaire exodus" stories in the billionaire-owned media, but it is not without challenge. https://taxjustice.uk/blog/britannia-card-would-be-a-license-to-tax-dodge/

And far be it from me to criticise Brexit supporters who've moved to the EU since Brexit (and use Exile in their new username), but it's worth noting that "Since the 2016 Brexit referendum, Britain has steadily transformed from a haven for the rich to a launchpad for their departure".
 
That’s just further proof of the problem though!

Most millionaires are hugely immobile, which is why when there were all the reports about the mass exodus leaving the UK, the media missed out that it equated to 0.3% of the millionaire population, which is the same percentage emigrating as any other group and in line with long term trends. The authors of the report you quote in a subsequent post (Henley) have backtracked on how they reported it recently.

None of that detracts from my main sentiment about the distribution of wealth though.
Yes but when it's someone out of a cohort that contributes massively to our overall income tax rate revenues, it's a huge loss.

And it doesn't detract from the actual empirical evidence: When we put the top rate up to 50%, it raised a mere fraction of what was projected, and and even smaller fraction of the amount had everyone paid it. They just didn't, in large numbers.

We can talk about theories and projections and forecasts, but that's what actually happened. There's no likelihood at all that were we daft enough to do the same again, it would somehow work out better this time.
 
Can you provide any that aren’t in the future tense?
Yes but I am not your PA. If you are genuinely interested (which I very much doubt) you can Google it yourself easily enough.

Since Labour took office the UK has lost 10,800 millionaires, compared to circa 4,000 in prior years.
 
Last edited:
I believe Johnson suffered almost a dozen defeats on votes in Parliament yet the press are displaying their bias again by having a Beano claiming this win by 75 votes is a disaster for Starmer. Its as clear as day what the agenda is.

they're making out its the first time ever in the history of politics a government has had some backbench rebellion.

Cult-like behaviour.

You might want to have a read of John McDonnell’s comment piece in today’s Guardian, a left-wing view in a left-wing paper (so that you can spare us all the right-wing conspiracy theories). At least the first half of it where he discusses the complete shambles surrounding the welfare bill.

It’s a fair summary of the situation Starmer has placed himself in and what’s likely to follow.
 
There's multiple sources. According to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025, the UK is expected to lose 16,500 millionaires in 2025, which is more than any other country in the world and more than double the number projected to leave China, which is second on the list with 7,800. This marks the first time in a decade of tracking that the UK has overtaken China as the top country for millionaire outflows. The report defines millionaires as individuals with over $1 million (about £740,500) in liquid, investable assets.





No, that’s one source with multiple reports of that one source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vic

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top