Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Nooo, jay, they've lost us as well!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Labour Party
- Thread starter Ban-jani
- Start date
Nooo, jay, they've lost us as well!
Paulpowersleftfoot
Well-Known Member
Why the media silence about it?
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
Always liked him but now the only conclusion is he’s an odious twat with a devious wife. Gave him the benefit of the doubt before the election when he was slagging off Jeremy to the Tories but Dr Rosena should be shadow health minister anyway.Jon Ashworth won't be enjoying his breakfast that's for sure.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,391
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
Why does everything have to contain an insult? That's school yard in itself and you are capable of putting your point well without it. It doesn't serve to emphasise your point as I suspect you hope, but just makes people less receptive to your views and is polarising. Obviously it's your choice, and I'm not telling you how to post, but I sense frustration that you can't get your views across sometimes and offer this in a constructive spirit.It’s not foaming at the mouth or not taking criticism it’s the calling out of a group of hard left cowards who snipe from the sides without engaging in the actual topic.
Always seems to be late at night when you’ve had a couple and feel a tiny bit braver.
Such as that little boy @bellbuzzer who just likes everything that’s personal against me but doesn’t ever get involved.
The fact is my point was backed up by an ex mod who is Jewish and I see none of you cunts have bothered to reply to that.
You engage in ganging up but duck the topic.
The fact most of you are middle aged and engage in school yard tactics just shows how miserable your lives must be.
Why does everything have to contain an insult? That's school yard in itself and you are capable of putting your point well without it. It doesn't serve to emphasise your point as I suspect you hope, but just makes people less receptive to your views and is polarising. Obviously it's your choice, and I'm not telling you how to post, but I sense frustration that you can't get your views across sometimes and offer this in a constructive spirit.
I suggest mate you read the post I’ve replied to.
It’s yet again a Corbynite coming into the thread, not addressing a single word on the point I’ve said and insulting me.
I am merely defending myself.
Several people have taken a huge back step because this group of people are attacking them for their opinions and ganging up.
They have sent me PMs to say they can’t be doing with the forum any more due to the same people now going after me.
I refused to be bullied by these hard left ideologues, it’s not going to happen and I’m still going to post.
If any **** has a pop at me I’ll have a pop back.
For example...If you go back through Alan Harper’s Tash and my arguments you’ll see it’s always him that goes to personal attacks first.
One of the most pathetic deflection tactics that takes up place and you’ve seen it in this thread, is that someone must hate Muslims if they attack labour on antisemitism. It’s a rehearsed message to absolve guilt from Labour.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,391
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
Fair enough, but try not to get in the gutter with them or you all get covered in shit. I still like to think that despite the range of views on here we are not among any actual extremists. I realise statistically speaking we may be in the company of the odd murderer but like to give the the benefit of the doubt :-)I suggest mate you read the post I’ve replied to.
It’s yet again a Corbynite coming into the thread, not addressing a single word on the point I’ve said and insulting me.
I am merely defending myself.
Several people have taken a huge back step because this group of people are attacking them for their opinions and ganging up.
They have sent me PMs to say they can’t be doing with the forum any more due to the same people now going after me.
I refused to be bullied by these hard left ideologues, it’s not going to happen and I’m still going to post.
If any **** has a pop at me I’ll have a pop back.
For example...If you go back through Alan Harper’s Tash and my arguments you’ll see it’s always him that goes to personal attacks first.
One of the most pathetic deflection tactics that takes up place and you’ve seen it in this thread, is that someone must hate Muslims if they attack labour on antisemitism. It’s a rehearsed message to absolve guilt from Labour.
Well well well, who'd a thought it? It's actually the right of the party that are the sly cult like twats.
they've lost the Jewish
You all seriously need to ask yourselves why this part has happened.
It’s brushed aside and compared to, in significance, to losing other groups but it’s far and away the biggest problem Labour have.
If a load of extremist antisemites fuck off and join Galloway’s new vanity project, that’s good for the party.
90% of the population looks at Corbyn and his followers as absolute nutters. You’re never winning an election with them being
Fair enough, but try not to get in the gutter with them or you all get covered in shit. I still like to think that despite the range of views on here we are not among any actual extremists. I realise statistically speaking we may be in the company of the odd murderer but like to give the the benefit of the doubt :-)
There’s no choice, the only other option is to withdraw from the forum and I’m not going to back down.
I’ll continue to debate the topic and if someone calls me a **** for doing so I’ll call them one back.
Ancient Citizen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 15,712
The remaining 10% are self isolating in various mental institutions.90% of the population looks at Corbyn and his followers as absolute nutters.
The remaining 10% are self isolating in various mental institutions.
Many of them are attack dogs on this forum.
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
You all seriously need to ask yourselves why this part has happened.
It’s brushed aside and compared to, in significance, to losing other groups but it’s far and away the biggest problem Labour have.
If a load of extremist antisemites fuck off and join Galloway’s new vanity project, that’s good for the party.
90% of the population looks at Corbyn and his followers as absolute nutters. You’re never winning an election with them being
And if the right of the party hadn't sabotaged punishment of antisemites?
Labour aren't winning anything any time soon, the in-fighting will see to that regardless of how anything else goes.
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
Many of them are attack dogs on this forum.
Why are you in this thread?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Why are you in this thread?
Because he is allowed and it isn't an echo chamber for momentum members.
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
Because he is allowed and it isn't an echo chamber for momentum members.
I thought you'd ignored me? Would be great if you could do that.
I never asked if he was permitted to post in here, I asked why does he? Trouble and fights follow him everywhere and he seems to be in here just to get involved in a little keyboard tussle.
And if the right of the party hadn't sabotaged punishment of antisemites?
Labour aren't winning anything any time soon, the in-fighting will see to that regardless of how anything else goes.
They’re only to right compared to Corbyn, they’re not actually right wing.
Well then that’s utterly ridiculous and disgraceful but it doesn’t absolve or explain why there’s mass antisemitism in the first place.
It seems to be the party is a cesspit of moral degenerates.
Why are you in this thread?
I created the thread.
I could delete it if I wished but I want open discussion and I refuse to let it become an echo chamber for a fringe group.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
I thought you'd ignored me? Would be great if you could do that.
I never asked if he was permitted to post in here, I asked why does he? Trouble and fights follow him everywhere and he seems to be in here just to get involved in a little keyboard tussle.
"He does" because he wants to.
You asking him and others whose posts you dont like is because you want an echo chamber.
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
They’re only to right compared to Corbyn, they’re not actually right wing.
Well then that’s utterly ridiculous and disgraceful but it doesn’t absolve or explain why there’s mass antisemitism in the first place.
It seems to be the party is a cesspit of moral degenerates.
Jeremy Corbyn tried to have Ken Livingstone expelled from the party. The right of the party (note: right of the party, not right wingers) purposefully gave Livingstone a soft punishment so that Corbyn looks bad and to 'create a crisis'.
If they did that in this one instance and it involved a prominent mp like Tom Watson and the wife of another, what else have they done to sabotage Labour's ability to punish proven antisemites?
If they hadn't sabotaged the entire campaign in 2017, would JC be pm?
It's all there in the report if you want o read it. Maybe, just maybe the weirdos on the far left were right about the intentions of the right to do everything in their power to stop a left Labour government.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
I created the thread.
I could delete it if I wished but I want open discussion and I refuse to let it become an echo chamber for a fringe group.
"He does" because he wants to.
You asking him and others whose posts you dont like is because you want an echo chamber.
Echo chamber? Very good.....