Have a read of this post.....some really interesting points from someone who seems to know what they’re taking about when it comes to player contractual disputes:
Sounds like the Webster ruling and invoking article 17 is our best bet! It has been used successfully in the past and it applies to Messi in this instance as he was over 28 when he signed his contract, and he has served over 3 years of said contract.
In essence, this means he is entitled to walk away and sign for free for another club under this ruling. The only ramification is that compensation may be due to Barça in future. However, the value of any compensation due would be much lower than the £100 million city are prepared to pay.
Sounds like the Webster ruling and invoking article 17 is our best bet! It has been used successfully in the past and it applies to Messi in this instance as he was over 28 when he signed his contract, and he has served over 3 years of said contract.
In essence, this means he is entitled to walk away and sign for free for another club under this ruling. The only ramification is that compensation may be due to Barça in future. However, the value of any compensation due would be much lower than the £100 million city are prepared to pay.