Did none of you notice where the SNP deliberately used words that convicted Israel of war crimes, which they were using to subvert and cause real issues within the Labour Party?Yeah Labour refusing to back a ceasefire on the basis they weren't the ones who'd asked for it and relying on the speaker to throw himself under the bus to get their motion through doesn't really count as handing anyone their arse. Especially when thousands of innocent people have been dying whilst they've been politicking about it for the last few months. Starmer's an embarrassment.
I blame the Tories. Looks like their amendment couldn’t get through because many of the backbenchers supported Labours.The Labour Party should be ashamed of itself.
Nothing to do with anybody else.
Did none of you notice where the SNP deliberately used words that convicted Israel of war crimes, which they were using to subvert and cause real issues within the Labour Party?
I‘ve posted the SNP motion and amendments in another thread, have a look and pick which motion you would vote for.
Wouldn’t rule that out although my money would be on Fenandes agreeing it via Cann’s coms.Only if he had had a chat with Eric before game and told him that it would be ok
I blame the Tories. Looks like their amendment couldn’t get through because many of the backbenchers supported Labours.
That’s some pretty magical thinking given that the Labour amendment only existed due to Labour forcing the Speaker to break Parliamentary convention.I blame the Tories. Looks like their amendment couldn’t get through because many of the backbenchers supported Labours.
They didnt force him to do anything or do you have proof tbey leaned on him or made threats etc ?That’s some pretty magical thinking given that the Labour amendment only existed due to Labour forcing the Speaker to break Parliamentary convention.
It was widely reported yesterday that Labour had threatened him with de-selection, and that was from the BBC which, contrary to perceived wisdom in here, is not an extension of the Conservative Party.They didnt force him to do anything or do you have proof tbey leaned on him or made threats etc ?
Evidence?That’s some pretty magical thinking given that the Labour amendment only existed due to Labour forcing the Speaker to break Parliamentary convention.
Did that detail come from Tory Central or from the lips of the Speaker?It was widely reported yesterday that Labour had threatened him with de-selection, and that was from the BBC which, contrary to perceived wisdom in here, is not an extension of the Conservative Party.