He had done a great thing but I'm not sure that he is doing it for the right reasons. Why put it on the Internet and not just hand it to the police? For his own publicity. Why say he would be happy if he got arrested for doing it? He would get more publicity.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Paedophile Hunter.
- Thread starter rushts
- Start date
rushts
Well-Known Member
I visited Stinson's website today, it's all on there...
Video footage, text messages, admission.
He's basically doing the time consuming stuff for the police for free.
Video footage, text messages, admission.
He's basically doing the time consuming stuff for the police for free.
bluemiester
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Aug 2011
- Messages
- 191
I watched this last night. I understand why many don't think he should put the videos on the internet, but at the same time I think people are ignoring what a massive deterrent it could become. The thought of such extreme exposure is probably worse than a criminal conviction. If these men start to become aware of sites like Stinson's surely it will scare many of them off. It would certainly make you think twice knowing there are vigilante's out there doing this kind of thing on a regular basis.
Also that guy Roger didn't even get a criminal conviction, but he did get some sort of justice via the exposure. Doesn't his case alone, support the idea of online exposure? The guy was guilty as sin, but if he hadn't been exposed online, then he'd have had no punishment at all.
Also that guy Roger didn't even get a criminal conviction, but he did get some sort of justice via the exposure. Doesn't his case alone, support the idea of online exposure? The guy was guilty as sin, but if he hadn't been exposed online, then he'd have had no punishment at all.
bluemiester said:I watched this last night. I understand why many don't think he should put the videos on the internet, but at the same time I think people are ignoring what a massive deterrent it could become. The thought of such extreme exposure is probably worse than a criminal conviction. If these men start to become are of sites like Stinson's surely it will scare many of them off. It would certainly make you think twice knowing there are vigilante's out there doing this kind of thing on a regular basis. That guy Roger didn't even get a criminal conviction, but he did get some sort of justice via the exposure. Doesn't his case alone, support the idea of online exposure? The guy was guilty as sin, but if he hadn't been exposed online, then he'd have had no punishment at all.
The fear of being caught will never stop people like that, never has and never will. It didnt stop me anyway
billfromthehill
Well-Known Member
Roger cook style but he should have brought them all in Mary d's car park on a match day at 6 bells and announced the **** on a tannoy whilst locking the gate .murder ball anyone.?CTID1988 said:bluemiester said:I watched this last night. I understand why many don't think he should put the videos on the internet, but at the same time I think people are ignoring what a massive deterrent it could become. The thought of such extreme exposure is probably worse than a criminal conviction. If these men start to become are of sites like Stinson's surely it will scare many of them off. It would certainly make you think twice knowing there are vigilante's out there doing this kind of thing on a regular basis. That guy Roger didn't even get a criminal conviction, but he did get some sort of justice via the exposure. Doesn't his case alone, support the idea of online exposure? The guy was guilty as sin, but if he hadn't been exposed online, then he'd have had no punishment at all.
The fear of being caught will never stop people like that, never has and never will. It didnt stop me anyway
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,634
I agree with the outing of these paedophiles but only in the correct way.
Posting on facebook or any social media puts any of his family members at risk of reprisal including children which simply cannot be right.
I think what Stinson is doing is admirable so long as he.does it the right way
Posting on facebook or any social media puts any of his family members at risk of reprisal including children which simply cannot be right.
I think what Stinson is doing is admirable so long as he.does it the right way
SteWadda
Well-Known Member
They deserve to be shamed on the net just for being so fucking stupid. Why did any of them think a young girl would be interested in having sex with them after seeing their picture.
How did the bloke who came to meet an 11 year old autistic girl not get banged up? Said it was GMP who did nothing about it aswell so this **** is walking around Manchester.
How did the bloke who came to meet an 11 year old autistic girl not get banged up? Said it was GMP who did nothing about it aswell so this **** is walking around Manchester.
kashmir
Well-Known Member
Watched most of it ,seems the only people against his methods were the police and solicitors
Makes you wonder why they so against his methods,which seemed effective to me
Makes you wonder why they so against his methods,which seemed effective to me
kashmir said:Watched most of it ,seems the only people against his methods were the police and solicitors
Makes you wonder why they so against his methods,which seemed effective to me
They are effective in 'outing' them but not necessarily effective in getting enough evidence to send them to prison, which will be the main priority of the police.
On the other hand, if it stops them from meeting a child or from being tempted to do it again, prevention is better than cure would be a good argument for him doing it.