chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 26,955
If you’re gonna allocate bonus seconds that way put some barriers there too.
Who is the better TT of the two?I thought Pog looked tired today, the TT is going to be interesting.
I found this on google:Who is the better TT of the two?
TT is 22.4k or a tad under 14 miles just about 25 minutes of racing. After that there are just two more tough stages on Wednesday and Saturday. Going to be exiting up to the 20th stage.I found this on google:
Vingegaard may have the edge in time trials, having secured first place at Paris-Nice and second place at the Critérium du Dauphiné. On the other hand, while Pogačar is the Slovenia national time trial champion, he finished fifth against Vingegaard at Paris-Nice.
Just the stronger rider , proved it all through this tour.Suspicious as fuck.
Have a look at the numbers being touted online…
Lol, oh he’s the strongest rider alright. By far. Remind you of anyone?Just the stronger rider , proved it all through this tour.
So are you saying the whole Visma team are in on it? Can't see it mate.Lol, oh he’s the strongest rider alright. By far. Remind you of anyone?
Suspicious as fuck.
Have a look at the numbers being touted online…
Suspicious as fuck.
Have a look at the numbers being touted online…
A lot of it uphill, only two riders were going to go for it.Sadly it does seem suspicious. To take that much time on a short tt. That's not forget that Pogacar did a good ride. To be that much better is mind boggling
I don’t know pal tbf. All I’m saying is, having listened to the Lance Armstrong podcast last night and read some bits & pieces, the size of the gap, not just to Pogacar but to Wout van Aert, who was definitely going full gas to try and win a stage for himself too, just doesn’t add up.So are you saying the whole Visma team are in on it? Can't see it mate.