The Rags potential demise ... and costs.

sir baconface said:
Did Bacon take his eye off the ball in his last two or three years? The reason I ask is because the thing he previously excelled at was refreshing and rebuilding the evil dynasty.
Anything but SB. He became consumed by repelling and then subsequently overhauling City before he retired to the exclusion of pretty much all other considerations. His eye was merely on a different, short term ball, as it were.
 
Bluemoon115 said:
Skashion said:
The Glazers have weathered the storm sadly, and pulled out some very impressive commercial deals. The best thing for us is that a) the Glazers remain in charge b) ditto Moyes.
I'm not sure if I understood properly, but I'm sure one of our financial experts (PB maybe) suggested that it's more cost effective for the Glaziers to have a team designed to finish 4th, than a team to challenge for the title.

Which would be an acceptable situation.

Absolutely. Think how much you have to spend to overhaul 5th place downward, Spurs and Liverpool are pretty much your main competition for that spot and they've both spent a fortune over the past few seasons. Then think how much extra you have to spend to get past Arsenal, Chelsea, and us. It all involves a crazy amount of money.
 
big blueballs said:
Bluemoon115 said:
I'm not sure if I understood properly, but I'm sure one of our financial experts (PB maybe) suggested that it's more cost effective for the Glaziers to have a team designed to finish 4th, than a team to challenge for the title.

Which would be an acceptable situation.

This is a very good point, look at Arsenal for example not won anything for 8 years, but income and profits were up during this period due to Champions League qualification etc meaning they kept there big club status and therefore keep good commercial partners and so on, thus allowing them to build a new stadium, while keeping spending on players etc down for a period of time

I think that the Glaizers would be quite happy with this situation at the Rags meaning as long as top 4 and the odd FA Cup is there every year that would be ok....having to spend millions upon millions every other year to try to win the league, Champions League etc wouldn't
 
mmh as great as the idea is, its more fun beating the rag scum than anyone else, we don't want them going too far, look how lonely Celtic are :D
 
I think others have already stated, we need them to be hovering there or there abouts to keep the bug eyed one in charge and them faltering. The ideal scenario is for him to possibly win them the League Cup, put them in a false sense of security that actually he can win shit but for him to continue to under achieve but being almost rans.

That way the football genius stays and Uncle Malc stays too.

Smeagol + Malc = City Heaven.
 
As pb will confirm, you don't buy a football club to get rich. You either buy it as a play thing, buy it to raise the prestige of your organization, or country. Buy it to ultimately claim residency as your home country may be dodgy, or your dodgy and you need something to launder your money through to avoid tax, or a criminal investigation, I wonder which one the Glazier family is?
 
VOOMER said:
As pb will confirm, you don't buy a football club to get rich. You either buy it as a play thing, buy it to raise the prestige of your organization, or country. Buy it to ultimately claim residency as your home country may be dodgy, or your dodgy and you need something to launder your money through to avoid tax, or a criminal investigation, I wonder which one the Glazier family is?
you missed one. the one where you buy a public organisation with massive status and transfer all your own debts onto it (they need to be higher than the purchase price for this to work, or else you need to be a good enough bullshitter to convince someone to lend you the money), strip it of its assets and cash and then give the public the choice of bailing it out or letting it sink when you cut your losses and run claiming "its a public company!, I have limited liability!" ;)
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
sir baconface said:
Did Bacon take his eye off the ball in his last two or three years? The reason I ask is because the thing he previously excelled at was refreshing and rebuilding the evil dynasty.
Anything but SB. He became consumed by repelling and then subsequently overhauling City before he retired to the exclusion of pretty much all other considerations. His eye was merely on a different, short term ball, as it were.
Bacon signed RVP. His last throw of the dice on a slightly aged, gifted and injury strewn striker. Allied with hard, concerted graft from his team and a season where RVP's fitness strangely outlasted his form for once, Bacon's legacy and ego could just about recover, bandaged yet unfortunately intact from the prior season's hurt. Hey ho. Let's enjoy their frustration now.
 
hutton who blue said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
sir baconface said:
Did Bacon take his eye off the ball in his last two or three years? The reason I ask is because the thing he previously excelled at was refreshing and rebuilding the evil dynasty.
Anything but SB. He became consumed by repelling and then subsequently overhauling City before he retired to the exclusion of pretty much all other considerations. His eye was merely on a different, short term ball, as it were.
Bacon signed RVP. His last throw of the dice on a slightly aged, gifted and injury strewn striker. Allied with hard, concerted graft from his team and a season where RVP's fitness strangely outlasted his form for once, Bacon's legacy and ego could just about recover, bandaged yet unfortunately intact from the prior season's hurt. Hey ho. Let's enjoy their frustration now.
Exactly. It's almost like last season's pain has directly led to this season's gain as far as City fans are concerned.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
hutton who blue said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Anything but SB. He became consumed by repelling and then subsequently overhauling City before he retired to the exclusion of pretty much all other considerations. His eye was merely on a different, short term ball, as it were.
Bacon signed RVP. His last throw of the dice on a slightly aged, gifted and injury strewn striker. Allied with hard, concerted graft from his team and a season where RVP's fitness strangely outlasted his form for once, Bacon's legacy and ego could just about recover, bandaged yet unfortunately intact from the prior season's hurt. Hey ho. Let's enjoy their frustration now.
Exactly. It's almost like last season's pain has directly led to this season's gain as far as City fans are concerned.
I concur. It would have been nice to see Bacon sizzling longer under duress under the grill but he's gone to the stands enjoying? his incumbent's offerings. Mancini the King has departed and now Pelligrini is in charge for City who are playing more adventurously and expansively than under the previous leadership. Onwards and upwards.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.