City were fined £9m for refusing to provide sensitive documents to a body that continually leaked to the press.
Not sure what the '£9 million based on technical deficiencies' he refers to are, the £9m was for what I just stated above. The ruling clearly states we did not disguise equity funding and that we couldn't be prosecuted based upon UEFA's own fucking rules, there are no technicalities involved.
As for tribalism, he has some nerve.
Maybe he's a double agent, what was it Karl Doon said ? "We hear the whispers" or something like that ;-)
This actually surprised me far more than being exonerated, CAS themselves described the leaks etc as 'Worrisome", so I was expecting it to go along the lines of " yeah, ok, according to this bunch of bellends rules, you were uncooperative, but we can absolutely understand why, so the bent bastards can swivel", or words to that effect.
He obviously forgot on Saturday then
Agree why weren't UEFA fined for all the leaks ?
Maybe he's a double agent, what was it Karl Doon said ? "We hear the whispers" or something like that ;-)
Wasn’t the letter on an Arsenal letterhead? Not sure we needed to engage the services of Sherlock Holmes to work this one out
The Karl Doon ? That was intentional bud lol .Ha ha, I like what your autocorrect did there.
City were fined £9m for refusing to provide sensitive documents to a body that continually leaked to the press.
Not sure what the '£9 million based on technical deficiencies' he refers to are, the £9m was for what I just stated above. The ruling clearly states we did not disguise equity funding and that we couldn't be prosecuted based upon UEFA's own fucking rules, there are no technicalities involved.
As for tribalism, he has some nerve.
Even worse (or better depending on viewpoint), CAS have said that the time-barred stuff shouldn't even have been considered and CAS themselves wouldn't have bothered looking. Of course the non time-barred stuff would have been looked at and dismissed as pure speculation from UEFA based on 2 or 3 single emails, so I think even the time-barred stuff would have passed muster.and that we couldn't be prosecuted based upon UEFA's own fucking rules
Ah that might be where I’m getting confused. Hard to keep up with these reptiles. I think Martin Samuel made reference to a London law firm, Russell’s, being engaged by the eight so they probably sent itI’m not sure. There was a letter on Arsenal headed paper sent to the Premier League about 7 or 8 years ago asking them to tighten up proposed FFP regs in the PL regarding allowable losses and asking for them to mirror those in UEFA’s FFP regs. That was signed by Arsenal, Spurs, United, and Liverpool. It could be that this time Sheffield United have tipped us off as to who the ringleader is.