prestonibbo_mcfc said:franksinatra said:everythingchangesbutblue said:so taggart got loads of bad press at the scum did he? you chat so much bollocks its untrue.
Well clearly he thought so hence the reason he banned them.
Banning journalists would just look small minded, petty and us becoming every thing we use to hate.
Also who would we ban? If fans on this forum had their way there would be no one left to commentate and report on City games. Even the likes of Quinn and Francis ex-city players do not escape the criticism of being part of the Agenda.
For example do we ban the Daily Mail? In the process alienating Martin Samuel who always defends our position on FFP. Or the Mirror and Simon Mullock a blue.
Or the biggest evil of all Sky. Who contribute millions enabling us to buy the great players we do.
Of course today its the turn of Glenn Hoddle. Will the ban extend to when we play QPR?
We cannot alter the perception of the club by banning individuals for expressing opinions about the club. It would be counter-productive. We get positive press and negative press. Its a fact of life for sny organisation in the public domain.
You obviously haven't read Martin Samuel's piece on our match with Bayern.
He too jumped on what was a fucking huge bandwagon.
everythingchangesbutblue said:so taggart got loads of bad press at the scum did he? you chat so much bollocks its untrue.Didsbury Dave said:Banning journos achieved nothing apart from more bad press.Keep winning games and trophies. Do our talking on the pitch.
Plenty of posters on here would get banned from the stadium using your criteria because the amount of fans talking us down this week, and much of this season, has been incredible.
ol blue eyes will present any bit of "evidence" no matter how tenuious to try and prove his no agenda line, it defines him.chesterbells said:prestonibbo_mcfc said:franksinatra said:Well clearly he thought so hence the reason he banned them.
Banning journalists would just look small minded, petty and us becoming every thing we use to hate.
Also who would we ban? If fans on this forum had their way there would be no one left to commentate and report on City games. Even the likes of Quinn and Francis ex-city players do not escape the criticism of being part of the Agenda.
For example do we ban the Daily Mail? In the process alienating Martin Samuel who always defends our position on FFP. Or the Mirror and Simon Mullock a blue.
Or the biggest evil of all Sky. Who contribute millions enabling us to buy the great players we do.
Of course today its the turn of Glenn Hoddle. Will the ban extend to when we play QPR?
We cannot alter the perception of the club by banning individuals for expressing opinions about the club. It would be counter-productive. We get positive press and negative press. Its a fact of life for sny organisation in the public domain.
You obviously haven't read Martin Samuel's piece on our match with Bayern.
He too jumped on what was a fucking huge bandwagon.
Bit redundant bringing Samuel into it; he may have been critical vs Bayern - as were plenty of blues - but there's a multitude of times he has stuck his neck out for us and gone against the prevailing anti-city hack opinion.
blue underpants said:Been saying it for years, let them all sit down in the press box then tap them on the shoulder and march them all out of the stadium, Collymore first, Mills second Custis third in the line, fucking humiliate them
pics or moblile footage?Prestwich_Blue said:Don't ban them. Let them watch us power on and on. They're like the jealous ex-boyfriend who suffered from premature ejaculation or impotence watching helpless through the window as their former girlfriend gets fucked senseless by her new boyfriend.