bluevengence
Well-Known Member
Pigeonho said:
How long have you been watching City ?...:-)
anyway we will agree to disagree
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tonking
- Thread starter BornLate58
- Start date
How long have you been watching City ?...:-)
anyway we will agree to disagree
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,618
Sugarloaf said:If BM dropped Milner and stuck sweep on the right, with strict instructions to cross the ball onto Dzeko's head, then we would score plenty. Even from the knock downs to Tevez, but he won't. It'll be another game of playing through the middle, with Carlos playing his one man mission to score more goals than Berbaflop.
SWP can't cross a ball.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Many do mate!bluevengence said:Pigeonho said:Yeah i've said that one was stonewall, but who's to say 100% we wouldn't have got the same favourable decision?
How long have you been watching City ?...:-)
anyway we will agree to disagree
One thing though, if United are so favourably looked after, how were Arsenal and Chelsea able to topple them at the top? Where were the dodgy refs then? Especially Chelsea who, at the time, were 'ruining football as well'. Did those 2 teams manage to displace United because refs refused to give United favourable decisions or, as I suspect, was it simply because they were better than United in their respective, successful seasons?
Bill
Moderator
Pigeonho said:Many do mate!bluevengence said:How long have you been watching City ?...:-)
anyway we will agree to disagree
One thing though, if United are so favourably looked after, how were Arsenal and Chelsea able to topple them at the top? Where were the dodgy refs then? Especially Chelsea who, at the time, were 'ruining football as well'. Did those 2 teams manage to displace United because refs refused to give United favourable decisions or, as I suspect, was it simply because they were better than United in their respective, successful seasons?
We'll talk again after the derby.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Doesn't really answer the Chelsea/Arsenal question but yeah, fair enough.de niro said:Pigeonho said:Many do mate!
One thing though, if United are so favourably looked after, how were Arsenal and Chelsea able to topple them at the top? Where were the dodgy refs then? Especially Chelsea who, at the time, were 'ruining football as well'. Did those 2 teams manage to displace United because refs refused to give United favourable decisions or, as I suspect, was it simply because they were better than United in their respective, successful seasons?
We'll talk again after the derby.
M
M
mat
Guest
we'll tonk the rags at the swamp.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
We won't, we can't... the refs won't allow it. 89th minute, Silva one on one with VdS when all of a sudden the camera pans to Fergie. 'aye', he says whilst giving a little nod. All of a sudden the 4th official dons a batman mask and rugby tackles Silva to the ground. United don't lose, we lose 2 points. Tis a dead cert. ;-)mat said:we'll tonk the rags at the swamp.
Bill
Moderator
Pigeonho said:Doesn't really answer the Chelsea/Arsenal question but yeah, fair enough.de niro said:We'll talk again after the derby.
I'm on my phone but I'll try.
Arsenal and Chelsea are not going to upstage the scum, ever. We are and the prem don't like it, marketing wise, subscription wise they need the scum at the top of the league, it's one thing Chelsea pipping them to the title but should we do it millions of gloryhunters will turn their tvs off.
Sky just won't let that happen, their fans are a dream customer for sky, armchair plastics twats that sit on their fucking fat plastic arses watching" their" team win things. Without those wins they will watch corrie etc mark my words. They are by definition gloryhunters, if there is no glory they will hunt elsewhere.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Fair enough mate, nice one for the reply. I can't agree with any of it, and time will show why, but fair enough all the same.de niro said:Pigeonho said:Doesn't really answer the Chelsea/Arsenal question but yeah, fair enough.
I'm on my phone but I'll try.
Arsenal and Chelsea are not going to upstage the scum, ever. We are and the prem don't like it, marketing wise, subscription wise they need the scum at the top of the league, it's one thing Chelsea pipping them to the title but should we do it millions of gloryhunters will turn their tvs off.
Sky just won't let that happen, their fans are a dream customer for sky, armchair plastics twats that sit on their fucking fat plastic arses watching" their" team win things. Without those wins they will watch corrie etc mark my words. They are by definition gloryhunters, if there is no glory they will hunt elsewhere.
Matty
Well-Known Member
I don't think tactically we are set up to give someone "a tonking". When Chelsea or United have a team on the rack they go for it and really hammer them, we get what we deem to be comfortably in front and then take our foot off the gas and try to coast home.