urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 31,042
Rose is injured for a long time mate. Secondly Gunn is nowhere close to playing a competitive game for us. The coaches see him week in week out. Its all easy to suggest lets have Gunn to cover for Ederson, what if Ederson gets injured for a long period. Do you think we can bank 3-4 months of our season with crucial CL, PL and cup games on Gunn being our goalkeeper?
As I said musing and was a reply about homegrown quota's, yes rose is injured, but if we signed bertrand then rose would be still an option as we would still have cover until he was fit (risky but still an option), and on Gunn and any 2nd choice keeper, which normally won't be as good as first choice is a risk that injury to the 1st choice means we may not have as good a keeper for a period.
Also it was a "what if?" scenario if bravo left.
Wlaker is a good signing and fair play for landing hin to txiki, if mendy and hopefully mbappe(rather than sanchez) sign then he will have had a blinding transfer window.